Disabling tinnitus
Abstract
Forty consecutive patients with disabling tinnitus were interviewed using a structured psychiatric interview and were asked to complete the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90), the Chronic Illness Problem Inventory, and the Revised Ways of Coping Checklist. They were compared to a control group of 14 patients attending the same otolaryngologic clinic with a complaint of hearing loss. The tinnitus patients had a significantly greater lifetime prevalence of major depression (78% vs 21%) than controls and a significantly higher prevalence of current major depression (60% vs 7%). The currently depressed tinnitus patients had significantly higher scores on all subscales of the SCL-90 compared to the nondepressed tinnitus group and to the controls. The number of psychological problems as measured by the Chronic Illness Problem Inventory was significantly greater in the tinnitus group than in controls. This difference in psychosocial disability was due to the high psychologic and social impairment in the depressed tinnitus group, as there were no significant differences in psychosocial problems between the nondepressed tinnitus group and the controls. These results demonstrate that tinnitus disability is strongly associated with major depression and suggest that treatment of the concurrent affective illness may reduce disability due to tinnitus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prevalence of major depression among tinnitus patients can reach as high as 60-78%.
“Reports indicate that the prevalence of major depression among tinnitus patients can reach as high as 60–78% (Sullivan et al., 1988)”
From Research trends and hotspots of cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus: a bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Sullivan et al., 1988
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 189
- Authors
- Sullivan, M. D., Katon, W., Dobie, R., Sakai, C., Russo, J., & Harrop-Griffiths, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Katon, Wayne
- Venue
- General Hospital Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285-291
- ISSN
- 0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1547980477
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
- Keywords
- tinnitus, major depressive disorder, psychosocial disability, psychological impairment, social dysfunction, chronic disease, coping, hearing loss, psychiatric comorbidity
- MeSH terms
- Depressive Disorder, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Sick Role, Tinnitus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review