Cited by 8Protein purification and stabilityBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Influence of fragment size on DNA quantitation using DNA-binding proteins and a sensor-based analytical system: applications in the testing of biological products

King, Robert S., Panfili, Peter R.·1991·Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods

Abstract

A novel immunoassay system which rapidly quantifies picogram levels of total DNA was characterized with respect to the effects of DNA length. Nine chromatographically purified HaeIII restriction fragments of phi X174 were tested. Assay performance was found to be dependent on both the amount and length of DNA present in the sample. DNA fragments longer than 100 base pairs (bp) could be quantitatively detected with this system. Fragments shorter than 100 bp inhibited assay performance and thus could be detected through the use of inhibition studies; however, only qualitative information could be obtained. DNA fragments approximately 10 nucleotides in length had no apparent effect on assay performance. The size of the binding site (number of bases) required for each DNA-binding protein to bind to a nucleic acid fragment is suggested as an explanation for the observed influence of DNA size on assay performance. The total DNA assay was used in conjunction with a Pharmacia FPLC system to characterize the size distribution and amount of DNA in two partially purified biopharmaceutical samples. The results indicate that the majority of residual DNA in these samples is less than 600 bp in length. This technique can be used to rapidly determine the DNA size distribution in an in-process or final product biopharmaceutical sample. This data can then be used in process design and optimization for removal of residual DNA in biological products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0165-022x(91)90053-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Threshold ® assay is negatively impacted by short DNA fragments (20 to 80 bp) through competitive inhibition preventing the formation of complete reaction complexes.

    “The Threshold ® assay is also negatively impacted by short DNA fragments (20 to 80 bp) through competitive inhibition preventing the formation of complete reaction complexes (King and Panfili, 1991).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, R. S., & Panfili, P. R.
Corresponding author
King, Robert S.
Venue
Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-07
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
83-93
ISSN
0165-022X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021576925
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
DNA quantitation, DNA fragment size, DNA-binding proteins, immunoassay, bacteriophage phiX174, binding site size, DNA fragment size distribution, biopharmaceuticals, residual DNA, fast protein liquid chromatography, process design
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Composition, Biological Products, Cattle, Chromatography, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Viral, Immunoassay, Oligonucleotides, Bacteriophage phi X 174

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review