The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of thick brain sections by obverse—Reverse computer microscopy: Application of a new, high clarity Golgi—Nissl stain
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Increased dendritic spine densities on cortical projection neurons in autism spectrum disorders
Hutsler, J. J., & Zhang, H. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.120 · Cited by 765
Chronic stress alters dendritic morphology in rat medial prefrontal cortex
Cook, S. C., & Wellman, C. L. (2004) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.20025 · Cited by 745
A method for vibratome sectioning of Golgi–Cox stained whole rat brain
Gibb, R., & Kolb, B. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(97)00163-5 · Cited by 622
Bessa, J. M., Ferreira, D., Melo, I., Marques, F., Cerqueira, J. J., Palha, J. A., Almeida, O. F. X., & Sousa, N. (2009) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.119 · Cited by 598
Biernaskie, J., & Corbett, D. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-14-05272.2001 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Glaser, E. M., & Van der Loos, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-125
- ISSN
- 0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984854704
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of thick brain sections by obverse—Reverse computer microscopy: Application of a new, high clarity Golgi—Nissl stain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0165-0270(81)90045-5
- The paper
- Glaser, E. M., & Van der Loos, H. (1981). Analysis of thick brain sections by obverse—Reverse computer microscopy: Application of a new, high clarity Golgi—Nissl stain. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(81)90045-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
