Effects of patterns of sympathetic nerve stimulation on vasoconstricting responses in the hindquarter of rabbits
Abstract
It is now well known that sympathetic nerve discharges (SND) of animals as well as humans oscillate at low frequencies. To determine effects of the oscillation or burst on vasoconstriction, we applied two different kinds of electrical stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic nerve, and examined the magnitude and rate of vasoconstriction in the autoperfused hindquarter of alpha-chloralose anesthetized rabbits (n = 6). In the first protocol, we obtained power spectra of lumbar SND of rabbits with sinoaortic denervation and vagotomy. The power resided over the frequency range of 0.5-5 Hz with a broad peak at 1 Hz. In the second protocol, we modulated the basal stimulus trains 5 Hz on an average with slower rhythms of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 Hz (frequency modulation). This experiment revealed that, compared with the results with constant stimulation, the frequency modulation of stimulation did not affect the magnitude of the maximal vasoconstriction but augmented the rate of vasoconstriction at 0.5 and 1.0 Hz (P < 0.01). In the third protocol, we examined effects of stimulation on vasoconstriction while changing the intra-burst frequency at a fixed inter-burst interval. Since the power spectra of lumbar SND showed a peak at 1 Hz in the first protocol, we fixed the inter-burst interval at 1 Hz and varied the intra-burst frequency at 10, 20, and 40 Hz while the total number of stimuli were kept constant at 5 impulses per second. This experiment showed that the 10 Hz burst was most effective in augmenting the rate of vasoconstriction, though the magnitude of maximal vasoconstriction was not affected by any of them.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Frequent, irregular trains of sympathetic nerve firing lead to greatly heightened postsynaptic stimulation.
“Frequent, irregular trains of sympathetic nerve firing are documented to lead to greatly heightened postsynaptic stimulation.54,55”
From Obesity Paradox in Hypertension: Is This Because Sympathetic Activation in Obesity-Hypertension Takes a Benign Form? (2018) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Ando, S.-I., Imaizumi, T., & Takeshita, A.
- Affiliations
- Kyushu University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Imaizumi, Tsutomu
- Venue
- Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-233
- ISSN
- 0165-1838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037818360
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Keywords
- sympathetic activation, vasoconstriction, burst frequency, frequency modulation, power spectrum, sinoaortic denervation, vagotomy, hindquarter perfusion, interburst interval
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electric Stimulation, Hindlimb, Male, Perfusion, Rabbits, Regional Blood Flow, Sympathetic Nervous System, Vagotomy, Vasoconstriction, Autonomic Denervation, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review