The development of the glucocorticoid receptor system in the rat limbic brain. III. Negative-feedback regulation
Abstract
In the neonatal rat, there are parallel increases with age in the concentrations of glucocorticoid receptors in the limbic system, and in the sensitivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to negative-feedback inhibition by circulating glucocorticoids. We speculated that the increasing receptor concentrations may mediate this increasing sensitivity of the HPA axis to the suppressive effects of glucocorticoids. To examine this idea we treated rats with exogenous corticosterone from days 29 to 34, resulting in a down-regulation of glucocorticoid receptors in the brain at Day 35 to levels similar to those of younger animals. Subjects whose maturational increase in receptors was reversed in this manner were less sensitive to feedback inhibition of glucocorticoids. Specifically, compared to controls they continued to secrete corticosterone after the end of stress, and were relatively insensitive to the suppressive effects of the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone, on corticosterone titers. Our data specifically implicate the hippocampus in modulating feedback sensitivity, as down-regulation was extensive in this structure, and did not occur in the septum, amygdala, hypothalamus or pituitary.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acceleration of cortisol increase after stress may reflect the intensity of excitatory input into the axis from the limbic system, whereas cortisol regulation after peak more likely reflects glucocorticoid receptor density and sensitivity in the hippocampus.
“For example, acceleration of cortisol increase following stress could reflect the intensity of excitatory input into the axis from the limbic system, whereas cortisol regulation following peak more likely reflects the density and sensitivity of GRs, primarily in the hippocampus (Sapolsky, Meaney, & McEwen, 1985).”
From Developmental psychoneuroendocrine and psychoneuroimmune pathways from childhood adversity to disease (2017) · cites this paper as Sapolsky, Meaney, & McEwen, 1985
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 158
- Authors
- Sapolsky, R. M., Meaney, M. J., & McEwen, B. S.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sapolsky, Robert M.
- Meaney, Michael J.
- Venue
- Developmental Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 169-173
- ISSN
- 0165-3806 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039193217
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 07080, NS17435)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- glucocorticoid receptor, negative feedback regulation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, limbic system, hippocampus, corticosterone, receptor down-regulation, developmental maturation, dexamethasone, stress, neonatal rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Corticosterone, Feedback, Female, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Limbic System, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Receptors, Steroid, Stress, Physiological, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review