Development of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide neurons in the human suprachiasmatic nucleus in relation to birth and sex
Abstract
The development of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) neurons was determined in the human suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of 43 subjects ranging from 27 weeks of gestation to 30 years of age using immunocytochemistry and morphometry. VIP neurons were first observed at 31 weeks of gestation in the ventrolateral part of the SCN. From 3 months postnatally onwards, VIP positive neurons were observed in some subjects in the centromedial part of the SCN. The centromedial type of VIP staining became a constant finding only at 19 years of age, at term the SCN was still very immature. Only in a few subjects some VIP neurons stained in the ventrolateral SCN and their number and nuclear diameter was small. Postnatally the number of VIP neurons increased gradually until around 3 years of age adult values were reached. After the age of 10 a clear sex difference in the number of VIP neurons was found: males having on average twice as many VIP neurons in the SCN as females. The adult VIP cell numbers in the SCN amounted only 35% of those found earlier for vasopressin. The present data do not support a particular role for VIP neurons in those rhythms that are already present in early development, e.g., of the temperature rhythm in prematures of around 30 weeks gestational age. Our observations in this and earlier papers as well as animal studies do suggest though a possible role for VIP neurons in the SCN in sexual dimorphic functions such as reproduction and sexual behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There may also be an increased number of cells expressing VIP during late adolescence in humans.
“There may also be an increased number of cells expressing a neuropeptide (VIP) that is important for photic entrainment and oscillator coupling during late adolescence in humans [183].”
From The neuroendocrine control of the circadian system: Adolescent chronotype (2012) · cites this paper as [183]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Swaab, D. F., Zhou, J. N., Ehlhart, T., & Hofman, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam Rotterdam (NL)
- Ningxia Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Swaab, D.F.
- Venue
- Developmental Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-259
- ISSN
- 0165-3806 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985577308
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- vasoactive intestinal peptide, suprachiasmatic nucleus, VIP neurons, neuronal development, sex differences, prenatal development, postnatal development, vasopressin, circadian rhythm, sexual dimorphism, reproduction, sexual behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Nerve Fibers, Neurons, Pregnancy, Sex Characteristics, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review