Cited by 105Peripheral Neuropathies and DisordersMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNerve injury and regeneration

Immunocytochemical localization of the myelin-associated glycoprotein Fact or Artifact?

Trapp, Bruce D., Quarles, Richard H.·1984·Journal of Neuroimmunology

Abstract

Immune staining for the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) by the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique in vibratome, paraffin and Epon sections of peripheral nerve resulted in a periaxonal ring of immune reaction product and an absence of staining over compact myelin. The thickness of the periaxonal rings of staining in Epon sections were similar when axons were surrounded by single Schwann cell processes and when they were surrounded by compact myelin sheaths. Thicker rings of periaxonal staining were present when axons were surrounded by multiple layers of uncompacted Schwann cell membranes. When swelling of the Schwann cell periaxonal cytoplasm separated the periaxonal Schwann cell membrane from compact myelin by distances that could be readily resolved in the light microscope, immune staining for MAG was found over the periaxonal Schwann cell membrane but not over compact myelin. Biochemical experiments in which myelin or MAG was treated with sodium ethoxide and hydrogen peroxide, under conditions similar to those used for etching Epon sections prior to immune staining, showed that the immune reactivity of MAG was stable to these treatments. Finally, a pre-embedding technique for immune staining at the electron-microscopic level showed MAG reaction product on the cytoplasmic side of Schwann cell periaxonal membranes and the membranes of Schmidt-Lanterman incisures and paranodal loops. These results confirm and strengthen the evidence from previous reports indicating that…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0165-5728(84)90011-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A relatively abundant MAG level might indicate a relatively intact myelin-axon interface in the CD1 mice, albeit a damaged outer myelin sheath.

    “a relatively abundant MAG level might indicate a relatively intact myelin-axon interface in the CD1 mice, albeit a damaged outer myelin sheath.”

    From Strain differences in cuprizone induced demyelination (2017) · cites this paper as [35]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trapp, B. D., & Quarles, R. H.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Trapp, Bruce D.
Venue
Journal of Neuroimmunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-07
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
231-249
ISSN
0165-5728 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062341365
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroimmunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
myelin-associated glycoprotein, compact myelin, peripheral nerves, Schwann cells, Schmidt-Lanterman incisures, paranodal loops, myelin ultrastructure
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Mice, Quaking, Microscopy, Electron, Myelin Proteins, Myelin Sheath, Peripheral Nerves, Rabbits, Schwann Cells, Sciatic Nerve, Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review