Effect of respiratory syncytial virus on adherence, colonization and immunity of non-typable Haemophilus influenzae: implications for otitis media
Abstract
Adherence of non-typable Haemophilus influenzae to respiratory epithelium was evaluated in a cotton rat model of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. Colonization with non-typable H. influenzae increased to a maximum within 4 days of RSV infection compared to RSV negative controls (4.58 +/- 0.17 vs 3.82 +/- 0.23 log colony forming units (CFU) per ml, P less than 0.05) and then declined over the subsequent 10 days (2.0 +/- 0 vs 3.78 +/- 0.39 CFU per ml, P less than 0.0001). In a second series of experiments, attachment of non-typable H. influenzae to epithelial cells collected from RSV infected cotton rats at the time of maximum virus replication was not different from controls (57.4 +/- 18.3 vs 52.0 +/- 24.3 bacteria per 50 cells). Systemic immunity to non-typable H. influenzae as measured by IgG-specific antibody to the outer membrane complex and bactericidal antibody did not influence colonization. These data suggest that colonization with non-typable H. influenzae is significantly affected by a concurrent infection with RSV; however, the site of bacterial attachment is not known.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical studies have shown that respiratory viruses increase the incidence and severity of severe secondary bacterial complications.
“Clinical studies have shown that respiratory viruses increase the incidence and severity of severe secondary bacterial complications (130, 207, 330).”
From The airway epithelium: soldier in the fight against respiratory viruses (2011) · cites this paper as [207]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Patel, J., Faden, H., Sharma, S., & Ogra, P. L.
- Affiliations
- Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo (US)
- Corresponding author
- Faden, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-23
- ISSN
- 0165-5876 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067755924
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (19679)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Keywords
- respiratory syncytial virus, nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, otitis media, bacterial adhesion, bacterial colonization, respiratory epithelium, bacterial immunity, outer membrane complex, bactericidal antibodies, cotton rat model, co-infection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Antibodies, Viral, Bacterial Adhesion, Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins, Female, Haemophilus influenzae, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Nasopharynx, Otitis Media, Respirovirus Infections, Respiratory Syncytial Viruses, Colony Count, Microbial, Sigmodontinae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review