Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Visual processing is organized hierarchically, so simple features like motion are processed earlier than complex features like the identity of objects or actions.
“This seems unlikely, considering that visual processing is hierarchical with basic information like motion being processed before complex information like the identity of objects or actions (Van Essen & Maunsell, 1983).”
From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Van Essen & Maunsell, 1983
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 962
- Authors
- Van Essen, D. C., & Maunsell, J. H. R.
- ORCID
- Maunsell, John H.R.
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 370-375
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050271480
- Cited by
- 962
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- visual cortex, hierarchy, macaque, visual areas, motion analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review