Axon-sparing lesion of the preoptic area enhances receptivity and diminishes proceptivity among components of female rat sexual behavior
Abstract
Stereotaxic infusion of ibotenic acid deleted neurons in the medial preoptic area (POA) in the ovariectomized female rats. A well-circumscribed lesion was infiltrated by astrocytes; local axons of passage were spared. Following estrogen priming and progesterone supplement, the females with the lesion had higher lordosis quotients than the vehicle-infused controls, when males successfully mounted them. On the other hand, the treatment did not induce solicitation in females with the lesion nor reduced their rejection of male partners. Meanwhile, gradual and persistent suppression of the lordosis reflex followed electrical stimulation through electrodes placed in the POA lesion. Except that the females with the POA lesion needed less estrogen to obtain comparable prestimulation quotients with the controls, the lesioned and control animals responded similarly to the stimulation. Because an adjunct neural transection dorsal to the POA lesion abolished the stimulus-bound suppression of lordosis, the effect was due to the activation of axons of passage that presumably descend from the septum. It is concluded that the POA is the major target for estrogen in eliciting proceptive behavior; local POA neurons as well as septal efferents appear to inhibit the lordosis reflex, the principal receptive component in female rat sexual behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In adult female rats, MPOA lesions facilitated the display of sexual behavior.
“MPOA lesions facilitated the display of sexual behavior in adult female rats (Hoshina, Takeo, Nakano, Sato, & Sakuma, 1994; Powers & Valenstein, 1972)”
From Quantitative mapping reveals age and sex differences in vasopressin, but not oxytocin, immunoreactivity in the rat social behavior neural network (2017) · cites this paper as Hoshina, Takeo, Nakano, Sato, & Sakuma, 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pfaus, J. G. (2009) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01309.x · Cited by 678 · see citing works
DiBenedictis, B. T., Nussbaum, E. R., Cheung, H. K., & Veenema, A. H. (2017) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24216 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Della Seta, D., Farabollini, F., Dessì-Fulgheri, F., & Fusani, L. (2008) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2008-0113 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Martinez, L. A., Levy, M. J., & Petrulis, A. (2013) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.08.016 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoshina, Y., Takeo, T., Nakano, K., Sato, T., & Sakuma, Y.
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 0166-4328
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Brain Science Foundation
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Naito Foundation (89-119)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review