The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the state space and frequency domain characterization of H∞-norm of sampled-data systems
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dual operator B* of B is given by (14).
“The dual operator B ∗ of B is given by [44]”
From $H^{\infty}$-Optimal Fractional Delay Filters (2013) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Bamieh, 1992, A general framework for linear periodic systems with applications to H∞ sampled-data control, IEEE Trans. Automat Control, 37, 418, 10.1109/9.126576 · DOI
- Boyd, 1991, A bisection method for computing the H∞ norm of a transfer matrix and related problems, Math. Control Signals Systems, 2, 209
- Chen, 1990, On the L2-induced norm of a sampled-data system, Systems Control Lett., 15, 211, 10.1016/0167-6911(90)90114-A · DOI
- Foiaş, 1987, On the H∞-optimal sensitivity problem for systems with delays, SIAM J. Control Optimiz., 25, 686, 10.1137/0325038 · DOI
- Francis, 1991, Lectures on H∞ control and sampled-data systems, Vol. 1496
- P.T. Kabamba and S. Hara, Worst case analysis and design of sampled data control systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, to appear. · DOI
- Toivonen, 1992, Sampled-data control of continuous-time systems with an H∞ optimality criterion, Automatica, 28, 45, 10.1016/0005-1098(92)90006-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou, 1987, On the weighted sensitivity minimization problem for delay systems, Systems Control Lett., 8, 307, 10.1016/0167-6911(87)90096-X · DOI
- Bamieh, 1991, A lifting technique for linear periodic systems with applications to sampled-data control systems, Systems Control Lett., 17, 79, 10.1016/0167-6911(91)90033-B · DOI · Paper page
- Khargonekar, 1985, Robust control of linear time-invariant plants using periodic compensation, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 30, 1088, 10.1109/TAC.1985.1103841 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
$H^{\infty}$-Optimal Fractional Delay Filters
Nagahara, M., & Yamamoto, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.2265678 · Cited by 15
“Introducing the dual operator [44] B∗ : Rν+1 → L2[0, T ) of B, and composing this with B, we can obtain a norm-equivalent finite dimensional system of the infinitedimensional system E .”
MethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamamoto, Y.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yamamoto, Yutaka
- ORCID
- Yamamoto, Yutaka
- Venue
- Systems & Control Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-172
- ISSN
- 0167-6911 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098407814
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Systems & Control Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Keywords
- H-infinity norm, sampled-data systems, state space analysis, frequency-domain characterization, lifting, Hamiltonian formulation, bisection method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
