The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Replications and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Belief in the law of small numbers.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031322 · Cited by 3,246
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 4×
“…are biased in favor of the publication of statistically significant (p < 0.05) results, thus contaminating their respective literatures with Type I errors whose incidence exceeds that prescribed by nominal alpha levels such as 0.05 (Feige, 1975; Greenwald, 1975; Hubbard and Armstrong, 1992).”
BackgroundInfluentialSterling, T. D. (1959) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1959.10501497 · Cited by 964 · cited 1×
“Sterling (1959) did not discover a single replication in his inspection of 362 published psychology articles.”
BackgroundA Proposal for a New Editorial Policy in the Social Sciences
Walster, G. W., & Cleary, T. A. (1970) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1970.10478884 · Cited by 144
Cited by
Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference
Chatfield, C. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983440 · Cited by 1,103
Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651235 · Cited by 1,070
Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners
(2001) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3 · Cited by 1,041
Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460688 · Cited by 750
O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730701615198 · Cited by 743
Metadata
- Authors
- Hubbard, R., & Armstrong, J. S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Research in Marketing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-248
- ISSN
- 0167-8116 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167037159
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Replications and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0167-8116(94)90003-5
- The paper
- Hubbard, R., & Armstrong, J. S. (1994). Replications and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary. International Journal of Research in Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)90003-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
