Cited by 43Hemispheric Asymmetry in NeurosciencePain Management and Placebo EffectNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hemispheric activity of 40 Hz EEG during recall of emotional events: differences between low and high hypnotizables

De Pascalis, Vilfredo, Marucci, Francesco S., Penna, Pietronilla M., Pessa, Eliano·1987·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

This study evaluates individual differences in hypnotizability as reflected in waking-state hemispheric engagement during recollection of 3 positively and 3 negatively valenced personal life events. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Maudsley Personality Inventory, Tellegen Absorption Scale and Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (Form A) were administered. Electromyogram (EMG) and bilateral electroencephalogram (EEG) activities within the 40-Hz band were recorded during rest and task conditions in 22 high and 21 low hypnotizable women. Self-report rating scores for vividness of visual imagery and emotional feeling of the material recalled were evaluated. The 40-Hz EMG amplitude and both hemisphere 40-Hz EEG densities were obtained. A 40-Hz EEG ratio, as a measure of hemispheric asymmetry, and a hemispheric specificity index were also computed. High hypnotizables showed significantly lower 40-Hz EEG density than low hypnotizables in all experimental conditions. The relationship between lateralization of 40-Hz EEG and emotional processing was moderated by hypnotizability. High hypnotizables, with respect to rest condition, showed an increase of density over both left and right hemispheres during two of the three positive emotional tasks, while they showed a depressed activity over the left and an increased activity over the right during negative emotional tasks. Low hypnotizables, on the other hand, did not exhibit differential hemispheric patterns that could be att…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0167-8760(87)90003-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have found lower levels of gamma power in highs relative to lows, and decreases in gamma with hypnotic analgesia suggestions among highs.

    “Other studies have found lower levels of gamma power in highs, relative to lows (De Pascalis, Marucci, Penna, & Pessa, 1987) and decreases in gamma with hypnotic analgesia suggestions among highs (De Pascalis, Cacace, & Massicolle, 2004).”

    From Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability (2015) · cites this paper as De Pascalis, Marucci, Penna, & Pessa, 1987

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Akpinar, 1971, Hypnotizability predicted by digital computer-analyzed EEG pattern, Biol. Psychiatry, 3, 387
  2. Bakan, 1969, Resting EEG alpha and asymmetry of reflective lateral eye movements, Nature (London), 223, 975, 10.1038/223975a0 · DOI
  3. Battacchi, 1984, Per una teoria delle emozioni, Teorie e modelli, 1, 3
  4. Bower, 1981, Selectivity of learning caused by affective states, J. Exp. Psychol., 110, 451, 10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.451 · DOI
  5. Bowers, 1971, Sex and susceptibility as moderator variables in the relationship of creativity and hypnotic susceptibility, J. Abn. Psychol., 78, 93, 10.1037/h0031327 · DOI
  6. Cole, 1985, EEG correlates of emotional tasks related to attentional demands, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 3, 33, 10.1016/0167-8760(85)90017-0 · DOI
  7. Crawford, 1982, Cognitive processing during hypnosis: much unfinished business, Res. Commun. Psychol. Psychiat. Behav., 7, 169
  8. Crawford, 1985, Cognitive Flexibility Dissociation, and Hypnosis, Presidential address presented at the American Psychological Association, Division 30
  9. Crawford, 1985, Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Hypnosis and Hypnotic Analgesia, 10th International Congress of Hypnosis and Psychosomatic Medicine
  10. Crawford, 1983, Enhanced visual memory during hypnosis as mediated by hypnotic responsiveness and cognitive strategies, J. Exp. Psychol., 112, 662, 10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.662 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Davidson, 1979, Frontal versus parietal EEG asymmetry during positive and negative effect, Psychophysiology, 16, 202
  12. De Pascalis, 1987, EEG asymmetry during covert mental activity and its relationship with hypnotizability, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypnosis
  13. Dimond, 1973, Difference in the vigilance performance of the right and left hemispheres, Cortex, 9, 259, 10.1016/S0010-9452(73)80003-6 · DOI
  14. Edmonston, 1975, Hypnosis and alpha density, Am. J. Clin. Hypnosis, 17, 221, 10.1080/00029157.1975.10403748 · DOI
  15. Engstrom, 1970, Hypnotic susceptibility increased by EEG alpha training, Nature (London), 227, 1261, 10.1038/2271261a0 · DOI
  16. Finke, 1978, Two personality measures relating hypnotic susceptibility to absorption, Int. J. Clin. Hypnosis, 3, 178, 10.1080/00207147808409319 · DOI
  17. Gainotti, 1984, Some methodological problems in the study of the relationships between emotions and cerebral dominance, J. Clin. Neuropsychol., 6, 111, 10.1080/01688638408401201 · DOI
  18. Galbraight, 1970, EEG and hypnotic susceptibility, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 72, 125, 10.1037/h0029278 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Glass, 1984, Hemispheric asymmetry of EEG alpha activation: effects of gender and familiar handedness, Biol. Psychol., 19, 169, 10.1016/0301-0511(84)90035-8 · DOI
  20. Gruzelier, 1985, Psychophysiological evidence for a state theory of hypnosis and susceptibility, J. Psychosom. Res., 29, 287, 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90056-X · DOI
  21. Gruzelier, 1984, Hypnotic susceptibility: a lateral predisposition and altered cerebral asymmetry under hypnosis, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2, 131, 10.1016/0167-8760(84)90006-0 · DOI
  22. Gur, 1974, Handedness, sex and eyedness as moderating variables in the relation between hypnotic susceptibility and functional brain asymmetry, J. Abn. Psychol., 83, 635, 10.1037/h0037353 · DOI
  23. Harman, 1977, Hemispheric activity during affective verbal stimuli: an EEG study, Neuropsychologia, 15, 457, 10.1016/0028-3932(77)90098-7 · DOI
  24. Johnson, 1979, Live versus tape-recorded assessments of hypnotic responsiveness in pain-control patients, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypnosis, 27, 74, 10.1080/00207147908407548 · DOI
  25. Karlin, 1979, Quatitated EEG features of negative affective states: report of some hypnotic studies, Res. Comm. Psychol. Psychiat. Behav., 4, 397
  26. Karlin, 1980, Hypnotizability, Attention, and Hemispheric EEG Activity During Verbal and Non-Verbal Tasks
  27. London, 1968, EEG alpha rhythms and susceptibility to hypnosis, Nature (London), 219, 71, 10.1038/219071a0 · DOI
  28. Loring, 1984, Laterality of 40 Hz EEG and EMG during cognitive performance, Psychophysiology, 21, 34, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb02313.x · DOI
  29. MacLeod-Morgan, 1982, Hemispheric specificity: a physiological concomitant of hypnotizability, Psychophysiology, 19, 687, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1982.tb02525.x · DOI
  30. Meszaros, 1986, Enhanced Right Hemisphere Activation During Hypnosis: EEG and Behavioural Task Performance Evidence, Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
  31. Morgan, 1974, EEG alpha: lateral asymmetry related to task and hypnotizability, Psychophysiology, 11, 275, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb00544.x · DOI
  32. Nowlis, 1968, Relation of eyes-closed resting EEG alpha activity to hypnotic susceptibility, Percept. Mot. Skills, 27, 1047, 10.2466/pms.1968.27.3f.1047 · DOI
  33. Pizzamiglio, 1983, The independence of face identity and facial expression recognition mechanisms: relationship to sex and cognitive style, Brain and Cognition, 2, 176, 10.1016/0278-2626(83)90007-6 · DOI
  34. Ray, 1976, Sex differences and lateral specialization of hemispheric functioning, Neuropsychologia, 14, 391, 10.1016/0028-3932(76)90035-X · DOI
  35. Sabourin, 1982, Hypnosis and brain function: EEG correlates of state-trait differences, Res. Commun. Psychol. Psychiatr. Behav., 7, 149
  36. Sabourin, 1986, EEG Correlates of Hypnotic Susceptibility and Hypnotic Trance: Spectral Analysis, International Organization of Psychophysiology,
  37. Shor, 1963, Norms on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypnosis, 11, 39, 10.1080/00207146308409226 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Sigman, 1985, Attentional concomitants of hypnotic susceptibility, Br. J. Exp. Clin. Hypnosis, 2, 69
  39. Spydell, 1979, Task-dependent cerebral lateralization of the 40 Hz EEG rhythm, Psychophysiology, 16, 347, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01474.x · DOI
  40. Spydell, 1982, Effect of problem solving on right and left hemisphere 40 Hertz EEG activity, Psychophysiology, 19, 420, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1982.tb02497.x · DOI
  41. Tellegen, 1974, Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (‘absorption’), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility, J. Abn. Psychol., 83, 268, 10.1037/h0036681 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Travis, 1973, Interaction of hypnotic suggestion and alpha enhancement, J. Psychiatry, 130, 1389
  43. Trotman, 1979, Sex differences in task-dependent EEG asymmetries, Psychophysiology, 16, 429, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01497.x · DOI
  44. Tucker, 1981, Lateral brain function, emotion and conceptualization, Psychol. Bull., 89, 19, 10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.19 · DOI
  45. Tucker, 1984, Asymmetric EEG changes as method actors generated emotions, Biol. Psychol., 19, 63, 10.1016/0301-0511(84)90011-5 · DOI
  46. Tucker, 1981, Right frontal lobe activation and right hemisphere performance decrement during a depressed mood, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 38, 169, 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780270055007 · DOI
  47. Ulett, 1971, Investigations of hypnosis utilizing induction by video tape, Psychosomatics, 12, 250, 10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71515-1 · DOI
  48. Ulett, 1972, Quantitative EEG analysis during hypnosis, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 33, 361, 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90116-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
De Pascalis, V., Marucci, F. S., Penna, P. M., & Pessa, E.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-10
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
167-180
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972996005
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hypnotic susceptibility, hemispheric lateralization, emotional valence, individual differences, visual imagery vividness, feelings, electromyography, absorption, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Functional Laterality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review