Neuronal activity in the primate supplementary, pre-supplementary and premotor cortex during externally and internally instructed sequential movements
Abstract
This study recorded the activity of neurons in the (i) supplementary motor area (SMA), (ii) pre-SMA (the motor area immediately rostral to the SMA), (iii) premotor cortex (PMC) and (iv) primary motor cortex (MI), while the monkey performed a conditional sequential motor task that ensures sequencing of multiple movements to the same manipulandum. This paradigm was chosen in order to prevent the participation of spatial cues in prompting the correct motor sequence. Three different movements (turn-push-pull) were performed under two task conditions: (i) internally determined (I): the monkey had to generate a pre-determined sequence from memory and without visual guidance; (ii) externally triggered (E): the correct sequence of movements was performed by following lights illuminated one after the other. Neuronal activity during the following periods were analyzed: instruction (300 ms following the onset of the auditory instruction signal); delay (interval between the end of the instruction period or the termination of the previous movement and the movement trigger); premovement (interval between the trigger signal and the movement onset); movement (interval between the mechanically-sensed movement onset and the completion of the movement) and reward (500 ms period centered at the time of reward delivery). Pre-SMA neurons were generally more active during the delay and premovement as compared to the movement, instruction and reward periods. Activity in the pre-SMA was more related…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neuroimaging studies have shown that internally cued and externally cued movements are associated with different cortical activation patterns.
“This hypothesis is supported by neuroimaging studies that have shown that internally cued and externally cued movements are associated with different cortical activation patterns (Debaere et al., 2003; Gerloff et al., 1998; Halsband et al., 1994).”
From Respiratory Responses to Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease (2022) · cites this paper as Halsband et al., 1994
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 225
- Authors
- Halsband, U., Matsuzaka, Y., & Tanji, J.
- Affiliations
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Tanji, Jun
- Venue
- Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-155
- ISSN
- 0168-0102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992661004
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Human Frontier Science Program
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- supplementary motor area, pre-supplementary motor area, premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, sequential motor tasks, delay-period activity, primate motor cortex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cues, Macaca, Male, Motor Cortex, Movement, Neurons, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review