Cited by 225Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Neuronal activity in the primate supplementary, pre-supplementary and premotor cortex during externally and internally instructed sequential movements

Halsband, Ulrike, Matsuzaka, Yoshiya, Tanji, Jun·1994·Neuroscience Research

Abstract

This study recorded the activity of neurons in the (i) supplementary motor area (SMA), (ii) pre-SMA (the motor area immediately rostral to the SMA), (iii) premotor cortex (PMC) and (iv) primary motor cortex (MI), while the monkey performed a conditional sequential motor task that ensures sequencing of multiple movements to the same manipulandum. This paradigm was chosen in order to prevent the participation of spatial cues in prompting the correct motor sequence. Three different movements (turn-push-pull) were performed under two task conditions: (i) internally determined (I): the monkey had to generate a pre-determined sequence from memory and without visual guidance; (ii) externally triggered (E): the correct sequence of movements was performed by following lights illuminated one after the other. Neuronal activity during the following periods were analyzed: instruction (300 ms following the onset of the auditory instruction signal); delay (interval between the end of the instruction period or the termination of the previous movement and the movement trigger); premovement (interval between the trigger signal and the movement onset); movement (interval between the mechanically-sensed movement onset and the completion of the movement) and reward (500 ms period centered at the time of reward delivery). Pre-SMA neurons were generally more active during the delay and premovement as compared to the movement, instruction and reward periods. Activity in the pre-SMA was more related…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0168-0102(94)90032-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging studies have shown that internally cued and externally cued movements are associated with different cortical activation patterns.

    “This hypothesis is supported by neuroimaging studies that have shown that internally cued and externally cued movements are associated with different cortical activation patterns (Debaere et al., 2003; Gerloff et al., 1998; Halsband et al., 1994).”

    From Respiratory Responses to Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease (2022) · cites this paper as Halsband et al., 1994

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 225

Authors
Halsband, U., Matsuzaka, Y., & Tanji, J.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tanji, Jun
Venue
Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-08
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
149-155
ISSN
0168-0102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992661004
Cited by
225
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Human Frontier Science Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
supplementary motor area, pre-supplementary motor area, premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, sequential motor tasks, delay-period activity, primate motor cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Macaca, Male, Motor Cortex, Movement, Neurons, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review