Behavioural deprivation: A central problem in animal welfare
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deprivation of a presumably highly motivated behaviour such as swimming is a welfare concern.
“Furthermore, the deprivation of a presumably highly motivated behaviour such as swimming is a welfare concern [51,52,53].”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 362
- Authors
- Dawkins, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dawkins, Marian Stamp
- Venue
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 209-225
- ISSN
- 0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119215897
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 45.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
- WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Keywords
- animal welfare, animal suffering, natural behavior, time budget, captive animals, behavioural enrichment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
