The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling cotton growth and phenology in response to temperature
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Extensive model validation efforts were conducted across the U.S. Cotton Belt (Boone et al., 1993; Fye et al., 1984; Reddy, 1994; Reddy and Baker, 1988, 1990; Reddy and Boone, 2002; Reddy et al., 1985, 1995; Staggenborg et al., 1996) and overseas (Gertsis and Symeonakis, 1998; Gertsis and Whisler, 1998).”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy, 1994
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Baker, 1983, GOSSYM: a simulator of cotton crop growth and yield, S.C. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 1089
- Brown, 1985, COT-CROP: Computer simulation of cotton growth and yield, Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Inf. Bull. 69
- Lemmon, 1986, Comax: an expert system for cotton crop management, Science, 232, 29, 10.1126/science.233.4759.29 · DOI · Paper page
- McKinion, 1989, Application of the GOSSYM/COMAX system to cotton crop management, Agric. Syst., 31, 55, 10.1016/0308-521X(89)90012-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Reddy, 1991, Temperature effect on growth and development of cotton during the fruiting period, Agron. J., 83, 211, 10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300010050x · DOI
- Reddy, 1992, Temperature effects on early season cotton growth and development, Biotronics, 84, 229
- Reddy, 1993, Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on cotton leaf growth and development, Biotronics
- Reddy, 1993, Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on stem extension, node initiation, and fruiting in cotton, Agron. J.
- Stapleton, 1970, Crop production system simulation, Trans. ASAE, 13, 110, 10.13031/2013.38547 · DOI
- Stapleton, 1971, Modeling subsystems for cotton plant simulation, Trans. ASAE, 14, 950, 10.13031/2013.38429 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, V. R.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reddy, V.R.
- ORCID
- Reddy, V.R.
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-73
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044747161
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
- Keywords
- cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, crop growth simulation, phenology, temperature sensitivity, extreme heat, cold stress, fruit initiation, flowering, boll opening, leaf expansion, crop simulation models, crop management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
