The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in biosorption of metals: Selection of biomass types
Open accessAbstract
Within the past decade, the potential of metal biosorption has been well established. For economic reasons, of particular interest are abundant biomass types either generated as a waste by-product of large-scale industrial fermentations or certain metal-binding algae found in large quantities in the sea. Some of these high metal-sorbing biomass types serve as a basis for newly developed metal biosorption processes foreseen particularly as a very competitive means for detoxification of metal-bearing industrial effluents. Ions of lead and cadmium, for instance, have been found to be bound very efficiently from very dilute solutions by the dried biomass of some ubiquitous brown marine algae such as Ascophyllum and Sargassum which accumulate more than 30% of biomass dry weight in the metal. Mycelia of industrially steroid-transforming fungi Rhizopus and Absidia are excellent biosorbents for lead, cadmium, copper, zinc, and uranium, binding also other heavy metals up to 25% of the biomass dry weight. The common yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a 'mediocre' metal biosorbent. Construction of biosorption isotherm curves serves as a basic technique assisting in evaluation of the metal uptake by different biosorbents. The methodology is based on batch equilibrium sorption experiments extensively used for screening and quantitative comparison of new biosorbent materials. Experimental methodologies used in the study of biosorption and selected recent research results demonstrate the route to novel biosorbent materials some of which can even be repeatedly regenerated for re-use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum
Langmuir, I. (1918) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja02242a004 · Cited by 23,242
Cited by
Effect of pH on the biosorption of nickel and other heavy metals by Pseudomonas fluorescens 4F39
López, A., Lázaro, N., Priego, J. M., & Marqués, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/sj.jim.2900793 · Cited by 147
Bioremediation of Radionuclide-Containing Wastewaters
Lloyd, J. R., & Macaskie, L. E. (2014) · Environmental Microbe-Metal Interactions · doi:10.1128/9781555818098.ch13 · Cited by 109
Medellin-Castillo, N. A., Padilla-Ortega, E., Regules-Martínez, M. C., Leyva-Ramos, R., Ocampo-Pérez, R., & Carranza-Alvarez, C. (2017) · Sustainable Environment Research · doi:10.1016/j.serj.2017.01.004 · Cited by 65
Metal ions binding onto lignocellulosic biosorbent
Krishnani, K. K., Meng, X., & Dupont, L. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A · doi:10.1080/10934520902847810 · Cited by 48
Ogunleye, O. O., Ajala, M. A., & Agarry, S. E. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Protection · doi:10.4236/jep.2014.515138 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Volesky, B.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-302
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978299672
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in biosorption of metals: Selection of biomass types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0168-6445(94)90046-9
- The paper
- Volesky, B. (1994). Advances in biosorption of metals: Selection of biomass types. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6445(94)90046-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.