Cited by 118Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Plasma islet amyloid polypeptide levels in obesity, impaired glucose tolerance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Enoki, Seiichi, Mitsukawa, Tomohiro, Takemura, Jiro, Nakazato, Masamitsu, Aburaya, Junko, Toshimori, Hirotaka, Matsukara, Shigeru·1992·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

We examined the response of plasma islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) to an oral glucose load in non-obese and obese subjects with normal glucose tolerance or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and in non-obese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Plasma IAPP response to intravenous glucagon injection in NIDDM patients was also studied. Plasma IAPP concentration was determined by a sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay. Basal levels of plasma IAPP in non-obese subjects with normal glucose tolerance, IGT and NIDDM were not significantly different from each other. Non-obese subjects with IGT showed delayed and higher plasma IAPP response to oral glucose load compared to normal non-obese subjects. In NIDDM patients, IAPP response to glucose was delayed and lower when compared to normal non-obese subjects. Basal levels of plasma IAPP in normal obese subjects and obese subjects with IGT were significantly higher than those in normal non-obese subjects. Plasma IAPP response to glucose load in these obese subjects was higher than that in normal non-obese subjects. Plasma IAPP response was decreased in diabetic patients treated with diet, oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin in that order. We conclude that the secretion of IAPP is reduced with progression of NIDDM, although it appears to be rather augmented in IGT compared to normal non-obese subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0168-8227(92)90074-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 118

Authors
Enoki, S., Mitsukawa, T., Takemura, J., Nakazato, M., Aburaya, J., Toshimori, H., & Matsukara, S.
Affiliations
University of Miyazaki (JP)
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
97-102
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991168896
Cited by
118
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
amylin, obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes, oral glucose tolerance, glucagon stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Amyloid, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucagon, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Radioimmunoassay, Reference Values, Islet Amyloid Polypeptide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review