Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcription factors: a new family gathers at the cAMP response site

Open access
Ziff, Edward B.·1990·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

lloMMENT Transcription factors: a new family gathers at the cAMP response site Promoters for RNA polymerase II are subject to a bewildering array of controls. Nonetheless, success in tracking transcription control path­ways has advanced dramatically through the identification of tran­scription factors that associate with specific promoter elements and mediate the transcriptional re­·sponse to cellular regulatory sig­nals. One advance came with the discovery that the serum-inducible transcription factors Fos and Jun associate with one another to form a heterodimeric complex that is member of the AP-1 transcription factor family and binds to the con­sensus AP-1-binding site sequence 5'-GTGAGT(A/C)A-3' (the TPA re­sponse element or TRE; reviewed in Ref. 1). Other progress came from studies of the cAMP response el­ement (CRE) 5'-GTGACGTA/CA/G-3' (Ref. 2) and the closely related 'activation transcription factor' site (ATF site)3. These elements differ from the TRE by the insertion of a central C residue. A new report from the lab of Michael Green at Harvard4 suggests that the CRE/ ATF site binds a family of factors with much in common with the Fos-Jun family. These families may serve as paradigms for other transcription factor families and may provide novel mechanisms of gene control. Control of transcription factor activity through dimerization The Fos and Jun families pro­vide the best characterized ex­ample of transcription factors that use dimerization to control func­tion. A distinctive feature of Fos and Jun is their interaction through the hydrophobic faces of two amphipathic a.-helices, one on Fos and the other on Jun (reviewed in Ref. 1). The hydrophobic face of each helix is characterized by the presence of 4-5 leucine residues spaced at intervals of seven amino acids along the chain. The helices interact in parallel arrangement EDWARD B. ZIFF DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CE'JTER, 550 FIRST AVE'JUE, NEW YORK, NY 10012, USA. through the interdigitation of leucine hydrophobic side chains to form a 'leucine zipper', a structure first proposed by Landschulz et af.S for the homodimerization interface the transcription factor C/EBP. More recently, O'Shea et a/.6 have suggested that the zipper assumes a 'coiled-coil' structure, in which additional hydrophobic amino acids present in a '4-3 repeat' stabi­lize binding. With Fos and Jun, 'zipping' juxtaposes basic amino acid sequences from each peptide, which cooperate to bind to the TRE sequence in DNA (see ref­erences in Ref. 1). Vinson et a/.7 have incorporated the coiled-coil structure into a 'scissors grip model' for the zipper which the basic amino acid sequences are Fos-Jun Family: TRE present in a.-helical continuations of the zipper helices, which are wrapped around the DNA helix at the TRE. This model closely juxta­poses the basic amino acid sequences from Fos and Jun accounts for binding of the Fos-Jun heterodimer to the 'directly abutted' dyad symmetric DNA sequences found in the palindromic TRE. The model also explains the obser­vation that molecules that are unable to dimerize cannot bind DNA. The DNA-binding domain requires structural contributions from both subunits of the dimer. The zippers confer high speci­ficity for dimerization (reviewed in Ref. 1). Thus, the Fos zipper avidly binds to the Jun zipper but does not bind to itself nor the zippers ATF-CREB Family: ATF Site FICO Formation of heterodimeric and homodimeric complexes between Fos Jun family me'llbers and members of the ATF family transcription factors and association with DNA. Members of the Jun family can weakly homodimerize or form stronger heterodimeric complexes with Fos family members. members do not self-associate. The different dimers bind equivalently to TRE elements in DNA. Because effector domains differ, different complexes with DNA may have transcription regulatory properties. With the ATF-CREB family, dimerization rules appear to be more complex. The indicated dimers are permitted and these all bind to ATF sites DNA. TIG MARCH 1990 VOL. 6 NO. 3 ©1990 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd (UK) OJ6H · 9479/90/S02.00

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90081-g

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Ziff, E. B.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
69-72
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005396212
Cited by
236
References
1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcription factors: a new family gathers at the cAMP response site. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0168-9525(90)90081-g
The paper
Ziff, E. B. (1990). Transcription factors: a new family gathers at the cAMP response site. Trends in Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(90)90081-g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.