Digital signal processing in studies of animal acoustical communication, including human speech
Abstract
The study of animal acoustical communication and other biological signals like cardiopulmonary cycles and neurological waves has advanced rapidly in the last few years. Progress has been stimulated by dramatic improvements in transducers, recorders, computers, and digital signal processing (DSP) techniques. Nevertheless, many biologists cannot take advantage of these new techniques and technology because mainframe computer usage is expensive and DSP theory is buried in highly technical engineering and mathematical journals. Recently, new developments in microcomputer hardware and commercially available DSP software have greatly improved this picture. Nevertheless, DSP theory remains largely inaccessible to the non-specialist. In this paper, selected areas of DSP theory are surveyed in relation to a common biological signal processing problem, namely, the analysis of animal acoustical signals. Signal digitization techniques are described, including the concepts of word-width, sample rate, and data encoding. An overview of the mathematical models developed for human speech encoding and analysis is presented. Finally, selected DSP techniques used in the time and frequency domains, including digital filtering, spectral analysis, and dynamic time warping are reviewed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital signal processing methods-Fourier transforms, cepstral techniques, and principal component analysis-brought reproducibility and comparability to bioacoustics and made it possible to test hypotheses about vocal learning, hormonal effects, and neurophysiological control with new rigor.
“These methods brought reproducibility and comparability to a field that had long relied on description, making it possible to test hypotheses about vocal learning, hormonal effects, and neurophysiological control with new rigor”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Davis 1986
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Davis, R. O.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, R.O.
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-196
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111324464
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Digital Filter Design and Implementation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- digital signal processing, animal vocalizations, signal digitization, sampling frequency, data encoding, speech coding, digital filtering, spectral analysis, dynamic time warping, biological signals
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Microcomputers, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Speech, Speech Acoustics, Vocalization, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review