Cited by 527Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Many sides of the coin: The psychology of money usage

Furnham, Adrian·1984·Personality and Individual Differences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(84)90025-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Furnham, 1982, The Protestant Work Ethic and attitudes towards unemployment, J. occup. Psychol., 55, 277, 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1982.tb00101.x · DOI
  2. Furnham, 1983, Inflation and the estimated sizes of notes, J. econ. Psychol., 4, 349, 10.1016/0167-4870(83)90039-9 · DOI
  3. Furnham, 1984, Value systems and anomie in three cultures, Int. J. Psychol., 10.1080/00207598408247546 · DOI
  4. Furnham, 1983, The Protestant Work Ethic and conservatism, Person. individ. Diff., 4, 205, 10.1016/0191-8869(83)90022-3 · DOI
  5. Furnham, 1984, Pocket Money: a study of economic education, Br. J. dev. Psychol., 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1984.tb00926.x · DOI
  6. Jahoda, 1979, The construction of economic reality by some Glaswegian children, Eur. J. soc. Psychol., 9, 115, 10.1002/ejsp.2420090202 · DOI
  7. Lea, 1978, The psychology and economics of demand, Psychol. Bull., 85, 441, 10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.441 · DOI
  8. Lea, 1981, Inflation, decimalization and the estimated sizes of coins, J. econ. Psychol., 1, 79, 10.1016/0167-4870(81)90006-4 · DOI
  9. Luft, 1957, Monetary value and the perception of persons, J. soc. Psychol., 46, 245, 10.1080/00224545.1957.9714323 · DOI
  10. Mirels, 1971, The Protestant Ethic as a personality variable, J. consult. clin. Psychol., 36, 40, 10.1037/h0030477 · DOI
  11. Neisser, 1960, Emotional and social values attached to money, Marr. Fam. Living, 22, 132, 10.2307/347329 · DOI
  12. van Raaij, 1981, Economic psychology, J. econ. Psychol., 1, 1, 10.1016/0167-4870(81)90002-7 · DOI
  13. Rubinstein, 1980, Your money and your life, Psychol. Today, 12, 47
  14. Srole, 1956, Social integration and certain corollaries: an exploratory study, Am. sociol. Rev., 21, 709, 10.2307/2088422 · DOI
  15. Wernimont, 1972, The meaning of money, J. appl. Psychol., 56, 218, 10.1037/h0033107 · DOI
  16. Wilson, 1968, A new measure of conservatism, Br. J. soc. clin. Psychol., 7, 264, 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00568.x · DOI
  17. Yamanchi, 1982, The development of a Money Attitude scale, J. Person. Assess., 46, 522, 10.1207/s15327752jpa4605_14 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Furnham, A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Furnham, Adrian
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-01
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
501-509
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169809892
Cited by
527
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
money attitudes, demographic factors, Protestant ethic, age differences, educational attainment, attitudes toward money

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review