Cited by 98Personality Traits and PsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

How personality relates to intelligence test performance: Implications for a theory of intelligence, ageing research and personality assessment

Robinson, David L.·1985·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90110-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 98

Authors
Robinson, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Robinson, David L.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-01
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
203-216
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038639202
Cited by
98
References
33
Citations by year
2020: 41 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
intelligence test performance, extraversion, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, brain-behavior relationship, personality assessment, psychoticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review