The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Urbina, S. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781394259458 · Cited by 1,845
Limitations of Coefficient Alpha as an Index of Test Unidimensionality1
Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. A. (1977) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447703700403 · Cited by 522
The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality.
Hayes, S. C., Nelson, R. O., & Jarrett, R. B. (1987) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.42.11.963 · Cited by 486
Cited by
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810141004 · Cited by 3,542
A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha
Peterson, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209405 · Cited by 3,028
An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001 · Cited by 2,906
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000626 · Cited by 1,470
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyle, G. J.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-294
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043388471
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
