Cited by 3Immunotherapy and Immune Responsesinterferon and immune responsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Quantitative modifications of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens induced by recombinant gamma interferon in two human breast cancer lines

Calvo, Fabien, Jabrane, Nabila, Faille, Annick, Gauville, Christiane, Cremoux, Patricia de, Lagier, Georges, Abita, Jean Pierre, Lechat, Paul·1987·International Journal of Immunopharmacology

Abstract

H466-B and T47-D breast carcinoma cell lines were treated with recombinant gamma interferon (r gamma IFN) to study major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II antigen responses. Untreated H466-B cells released B2 microglobulin (B2M) into the culture medium and expressed B2M and class I heavy chain on 100% of the cells. The expression of class II antigens (DR) was limited to 8 +/- 4% of the cells. This subpopulation was isolated by cell sorting and labelled with 35S methionine. Protein extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-DR antibody and subjected to two dimensional non-equilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis (2D-PAGE). A normal pattern of expression of invariant, alpha and beta chains was shown. The MHC antigenic expression of H466-B parental cell line was not modified by interferon treatment. Untreated T47-D cells did not release B2M into the culture medium, expressed B2M and class I heavy chain on 100% of the cells but did not express class II molecules using radio-immunoassay or 2D-PAGE. As early as 24 h after r gamma IFN addition, T47-D cells released B2M into the medium, B2M and class I heavy chain were significantly greater than that of untreated cells, and class II antigenic expression was found, all these in a dose dependent manner. 2D-PAGE analysis of class II antigens revealed the profile of human DR molecules but this expression seemed incomplete since only single alpha and beta spots were detected suggesting a possible defect in the sialilation of DR molecules. These results show a heterogeneity in MHC antigenic responses to r gamma IFN and suggest that synthetized class II molecules may be incompletely processed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0192-0561(87)90020-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvo, F., Jabrane, N., Faille, A., Gauville, C., Cremoux, P. D., Lagier, G., Abita, J. P., & Lechat, P.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Immunopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
459-468
ISSN
0192-0561 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097508724
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Immunopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
interferon-gamma, MHC class I antigens, MHC class II antigens, breast cancer cell lines, T47D cells, beta2-microglobulin, HLA-DR, antigen processing
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigens, Neoplasm, beta 2-Microglobulin, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Division, Cell Line, HLA Antigens, HLA-D Antigens, Humans, Interferon-gamma, Isoelectric Point, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Molecular Weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review