The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning to read words: Individual differences in developmental sequences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is significant variability and multiple cultural influences in the pathways by which children develop literacies.
“As with other skills, there is significant variability-and multiple cultural influences-in the pathways by which children develop these literacies.”
From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context1 (2019) · cites this paper as Knight & Fischer, 1992
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Brenfenbrenner, U. (in press). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. Wozniak & K.W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Collins, 1990, Using the longitudinal Guttman simplex as a basis for measuring growth, Psychological Bulletin, 108, 128, 10.1037/0033-2909.108.1.128 · DOI
- Ehri, 1979, Linguistic insight: Threshold of reading acquisition, Vol. 1
- Fischer, 1980, A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills, Psychological Review, 87, 477, 10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.477 · DOI
- Fischer, 1987, Generalization about generalization: How a theory of skill development explains both generality and specificity, International Journal of Psychology, 22, 643, 10.1080/00207598708246798 · DOI · Paper page
- Fischer, 1992, Analyzing diversity in developmental pathways: Methods and concepts, 10.1159/000421905 · DOI
- Fogel, 1987, Development of early expressive and communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective, Developmental Psychology, 23, 747, 10.1037/0012-1649.23.6.747 · DOI
- Green, 1956, A method of scalogram analysis using summary statistics, Psychometrika, 21, 79, 10.1007/BF02289088 · DOI
- Guttman, 1944, A basis for scaling qualitative data, American Sociological Review, 9, 139, 10.2307/2086306 · DOI
- Hiebert, 1984, A developmental sequence in preschool children's acquisition of reading readiness skills and print awareness concepts, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 115, 10.1016/0193-3973(84)90012-1 · DOI
- Johnson, 1987, Preschool children's retention of rhyming and nonrhyming text: Paraphrase and rote recitation measures, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 317, 10.1016/0193-3973(87)90007-4 · DOI
- Kitchener, 1990, A skill approach to the development of reflective thinking, 48, 10.1159/000418980 · DOI
- Kofsky, 1966, A scalogram study of classificatory development, Child Development, 37, 191, 10.2307/1126439 · DOI
- Krus, 1977, Order analysis: An inferential model of dimensional analysis and scaling, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 587, 10.1177/001316447703700302 · DOI
- Krus, 1988, Test reliability and homogeneity from the perspective of the ordinal test theory, Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 79, 10.1207/s15324818ame0101_7 · DOI
- Krus, 1979, Dominance, information and hierarchical scaling of variance space, Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 515, 10.1177/014662167900300408 · DOI
- LaBerge, 1974, Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293, 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Levin, 1989, Becoming literate: Referential and phonetic strategies in early reading and writing, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 369, 10.1177/016502548901200306 · DOI
- Lundberg, 1980, Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159, 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1980.tb00356.x · DOI
- Mason, 1980, When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old children's letter and word reading competencies, Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 205, 10.2307/747325 · DOI
- Morton, 1969, Interaction of information in word recognition, Psychological Review, 76, 165, 10.1037/h0027366 · DOI
- Nicolson, 1990, Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia resarch, Cognition, 35, 159, 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90013-A · DOI
- Pratt, 1988, Relation of phonological awareness to reading disability in children and adults, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 319, 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.319 · DOI
- Rasch, 1966, An item analysis which takes individual differences into account, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1966.tb00354.x · DOI
- Shankweiler, 1986, Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach, Cognition, 24, 139, 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90008-9 · DOI
- Stanovich, 1986, Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy, Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360, 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Stuart, 1988, Does reading develop in a sequence of stages?, Cognition, 30, 139, 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90038-8 · DOI
- Tallal, 1982, Perceptual/motor profiles of reading impaired children with or without concomitant oral language deficits, Annals of Dyslexia, 32, 163, 10.1007/BF02647960 · DOI
- Tatsuoka, 1986, Graph theory and its applications in educational research: A review and integration, Review of Educational Research, 56, 291, 10.3102/00346543056003291 · DOI
- Venezky, 1975, The curious role of letter names in reading instruction, Visible Language, 9, 7
- Venezky, 1977, Research on reading processes: A historical perspective, American Psychologist, 32, 339, 10.1037/0003-066X.32.5.339 · DOI
- Wagner, 1987, The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills, Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192, 10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 · DOI · Paper page
- Walsh, 1988, The critical but transitory importance of letter naming, Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 103, 10.2307/747907 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context1
Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649 · Cited by 328
“…that address these alternative pathways and, in so doing, channel student effort toward the pathway where individual progress will be greatest, therein optimizing developmental range and literacy development for all students (Fischer et al., 2007; Knight & Fischer, 1992; Wold & Katzir-Cohen, 2009).”
BackgroundDynamic Development of Thinking, Feeling, and Acting
Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy104 · Cited by 115
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, C. C., & Fischer, K. W.
- Affiliations
- Baldwin Wallace University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, Kurt W.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-404
- ISSN
- 0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982823150
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- early reading acquisition, developmental sequence, individual differences, phonological processing, reading difficulties, rhyme, letter recognition, pattern analysis, Guttman scaling, first and second grade children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review