Analysis of alpha-2 adrenergic agonist effects on the delayed nonmatch-to-sample performance of aged rhesus monkeys
Abstract
The administration of alpha-2 adrenergic agonists to aged monkeys has been shown to ameliorate their cognitive deficits on the delayed response (DR) task, a test of spatial working memory (3,5). The present experiment tested whether the alpha-2 agonists, clonidine and guanfacine, would also improve working memory for object feature recognition, as tested by the delayed nonmatch-to-sample (DNMS) task. Five aged monkeys were trained on DNMS and were found to have mild performance deficits comparable to those reported previously for monkeys of similar age (32). However, during the subsequent two years of drug testing, the animals' baseline performance steadily improved, and conditions had to be made progressively more difficult to produce errors in performance. Clonidine and guanfacine significantly altered the DNMS performance of the aged monkeys, but drug-induced improvement was not as robust for DNMS as it was for DR. Clonidine produced a triphasic dose/response curve: Impairment was observed at both very low and high doses, while modest improvement was seen in the middle dose range (average maximal improvement of 21 +/- 2.4%). Although improvement could occasionally be replicated for some doses, the clonidine dose/response curves were remarkably inconsistent in the middle dose range. Similarly, doses of guanfacine which had previously produced optimal improvement on the DR task, produced only small but significant improvement in DNMS performance (average improvement of 11 +/…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The notion of too much or too little stress yielding suboptimal effects on brain and behavior, but moderate stress yielding benefits in an inverted-U pattern, has been around for some time.
“Though the concept of stress inoculation remains relatively unexplored in human development, the notion of too much or too little stress yielding suboptimal effects on brain and behavior, but moderate stress yielding benefits in an inverted-U pattern, has been around for some time (Arnsten and Goldman-Rakic, 1990, Arnsten and Goldman-Rakic, 1998, McEwen and Sapolsky, 1995).”
From The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery (2015) · cites this paper as Arnsten and Goldman-Rakic, 1990
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Arnsten, A. F. T., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arnsten, A.F.T.
- ORCID
- Arnsten, A.F.T.
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 583-590
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056278614
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG06036)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, clonidine, guanfacine, spatial working memory, cognitive aging, dose-response relationship, ceiling effect, delayed response task
- MeSH terms
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Aging, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Injections, Intramuscular, Macaca mulatta, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review