Spatial relationships between astrocytes and classical plaque components
Abstract
Four biopsies of the brain cortex of patients with Alzheimer's disease were used for ultrastructural studies. Three-dimensional reconstruction and morphometric studies of three classical plaques were carried out to determine the distribution of the astrocytes and their processes, and spatial relationships between astrocytes and plaque components. Morphologic and morphometric studies showed marked ultrastructural changes in the astrocytes located in the vicinity of the plaque. Proliferating processes of the two or three astrocytes nearest to the plaque become part of the plaque. Processes of hypertrophic astrocytes touch neighboring vessels, neurons, and amyloid deposits. The volume of the peripheral amyloid deposits in the classical plaques examined exceeds the volume of the amyloid star by about 26%. Amyloid of the classical plaque periphery appears as amyloid wisps. Most amyloid wisps are isolated between astrocytic processes proliferating and penetrating into the plaque. Proliferation and penetration of astrocytic processes into the plaque lead to fragmentation of amyloid deposits and their dispersion. Reduction in the size of amyloid wisps isolated between astrocytic processes toward the plaque periphery and changes in the morphology of amyloid fibers in this plaque region suggest that astrocytes participate in gradual degradation of at least part of the amyloid fibers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ultrastructural studies have shown that astrocytic invasion of plaques is associated with fragmentation of amyloid.
“Furthermore, ultrastructural studies have shown that astrocytic invasion of plaques is associated with fragmentation of amyloid (56, 59).”
From Attenuating astrocyte activation accelerates plaque pathogenesis in APP/PS1 mice (2013) · cites this paper as [59]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Wisniewski, H. M., & Wegiel, J.
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-600
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980522970
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p01hd022634-05)
- National Institute on Aging (P0-1-AGO-4220-05)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P0-1-HD-22634-0)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- astrocytes, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, astrocyte proliferation, astrocyte ultrastructure, astrocyte processes, 3D reconstruction, morphometrics
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Astrocytes, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Neurons, Synapses, Neurites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review