Albacore tuna catch distributions relative to environmental features observed from satellites
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Laurs et al. (1984) found that nearly all albacore tuna catch in the California Current during a two-month period occurred along the offshore side of an upwelling-derived frontal boundary.
“Laurs et al. (1984) found that nearly all albacore tuna ( Thunnus alalunga ) catch in the California Current during a two-month period occurred along the offshore side of an upwelling-derived frontal boundary; this region was characterized by low phytoplankton pigment concentration and temperatures colder than the nearby coastal waters of the Southern California Bight (18-20 ◦ C) but warmer than”
From Oceanographic determinants of ocean sunfish (Mola mola) and bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) bycatch patterns in the California large mesh drift gillnet fishery (2017) · cites this paper as Laurs et al., 1984
That region was characterized by low phytoplankton pigment concentration and temperatures colder than the nearby coastal waters of the Southern California Bight (18-20°C) but warmer than the upwelling zone (10-12°C).
“Laurs et al. (1984) found that nearly all albacore tuna ( Thunnus alalunga ) catch in the California Current during a two-month period occurred along the offshore side of an upwelling-derived frontal boundary; this region was characterized by low phytoplankton pigment concentration and temperatures colder than the nearby coastal waters of the Southern California Bight (18-20 ◦ C) but warmer than”
From Oceanographic determinants of ocean sunfish (Mola mola) and bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) bycatch patterns in the California large mesh drift gillnet fishery (2017) · cites this paper as Laurs et al., 1984
Oceanic fronts and eddies frequently attract tunas and billfishes, likely because they can enhance and concentrate local productivity.
“Similarly, oceanic fronts and eddies frequently attract tunas and billfishes (Sund et al. 1981, Laurs et al. 1984, Fiedler & Bernard 1987, Santos 1994), likely because they can enhance and concentrate local productivity (Wolanski & Hamner 1988, Oschlies & Garçon 1998).”
From Effects of temperature on global patterns of tuna and billfish richness (2008) · cites this paper as Laurs et al. 1984
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Laurs, R. M., Fiedler, P. C., & Montgomery, D. R.
- Affiliations
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Fiedler, Paul C.
- Venue
- Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1085-1099
- ISSN
- 0198-0149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124258279
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Deep Sea Research Part A Oceanographic Research Papers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
- Keywords
- albacore tuna, fish aggregations, sea surface temperature, satellite remote sensing, California Current
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
