Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tectonic boundaries within the Grenville province of the Canadian shield

Davidson, A.·1984·Journal of Geodynamics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0264-3707(84)90018-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Berthé, 1979, Orthogneiss, mylonite and noncoaxial deformation of granites: the example of the South Armorican Shear Zone, J. of Struct. Geol., 1, 31, 10.1016/0191-8141(79)90019-1 · DOI
  2. Connare, 1984, RbSr geochronology of two high grade orthogneisses, Parry Sound, Ontario (abstract), Geol. Assoc. Canada, Program with Abstracts, 9, 54
  3. Ramsay, 1970, Strain variation in shear belts, Can. J. Earth Sci., 7, 786, 10.1139/e70-078 · DOI
  4. Stockwell, 1982, Proposals for time classification and correlation of Precambrian rocks and events in Canada and adjacent areas of the Canadian Shield; Part 1: A time classification of Precambrian rocks and events, Geol. Surv. of Canada, Paper 80-19, 135
  5. White, 1980, On mylonites in ductile shear zones, J. Struct. Geol., 2, 175, 10.1016/0191-8141(80)90048-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davidson, A.
Venue
Journal of Geodynamics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-12
Volume
1
Issue
3-5
Pages
433-444
ISSN
0264-3707
Cited by
48
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review