Cited by 115Gender Roles and Identity StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Male intolerance of depression: A review with implications for psychotherapy

Warren, Lynda W.·1983·Clinical Psychology Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0272-7358(83)90009-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–114 of 114

Metadata

Authors
Warren, L. W.
Affiliations
California State University, San Bernardino (US)
Corresponding author
Warren, Lynda W.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
147-156
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055551217
Cited by
115
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
male depression, sex differences in depression, help-seeking, coping with depression, masculine socialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review