Cited by 636Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Dropping out of substance abuse treatment: A clinically oriented review.

Stark, Michael J.·1992·Clinical Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0272-7358(92)90092-m

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 114 · Cited by 636

Authors
Stark, M. J.
Affiliations
Lewis & Clark College (US)
Corresponding author
Stark, Michael J.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
93-116
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977574475
Cited by
636
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
treatment discontinuation, addiction treatment, treatment retention, client motivation, criminality, legal pressure, prior treatment history, psychopathology, clinic size, treatment costs, group therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review