Cited by 60Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

A model of cognitive development across the life span

DENNEY, N·1984·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0273-2297(84)90006-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DENNEY, N.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
DENNEY, N
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
171-191
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000319606
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
cognitive development, lifespan development, intellectual potential, cognitive training, cognitive aging, cognitive performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review