Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Successions of invertebrate microfossils and the late quaternary deglaciation of the central St Lawrence Lowland, Canada and United States

Rodrigues, Cyril G.·1992·Quaternary Science Reviews

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0277-3791(92)90010-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rodrigues (1992) claimed that the marine-limit dates are too old, and that dates from deeper parts of the Champlain Sea indicate that marine transgression in the central St. Lawrence lowland began between 11,600 and 11,400 BP.

    “Moreover, Rodrigues (1992) claimed that the marine-limit dates are too old, and that dates from deeper parts of the Champlain Sea indicate that marine transgression in the central St. Lawrence lowland began between 11,600 and 11,400 BP.”

    From Deglaciation of the northwestern White Mountains, New Hampshire (2002) · cites this paper as Rodrigues (1992)

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, C. G.
Venue
Quaternary Science Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
503-534
ISSN
0277-3791
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review