The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communicative styles and adaptations in physician–parent consultations
Abstract
This investigation compares the degree to which personal and interactive factors respectively account for variation in patterns of physician-parent communicative exchange. The analysis of audiorecordings of 115 pediatric consultations revealed several notable findings: (a) individual physicians differed in the degree to which each provided information, issued directives, exhibited positive socioemotional behavior, and engaged in partnership-building, (b) parents who asked more questions and expressed more negative affect (e.g. concerns, frustrations) received more information and directives from physicians, (c) parents who were more affectively expressive elicited a greater number of positive socioemotional comments from doctors, and (d) parents' question-asking and opinion-giving were related to the parents' level of education and the degree to which physicians' engaged in partnership-building. The results of this study suggest that, as are other forms of interpersonal communication, medical consultations are processes of personal and mutual influence that unfold according to the characteristics of the individuals and to interactive processes related to how interactants adapt their communication to one another.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The studies of Street et al. (supra) concluded that doctors provided more comments of reassurance, support and empathy to parents who were more affectively expressive (more specificly who expressed more negative affect).”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In this study it becomes clear that more educated parents not only are more expressive and have a higher level of being opinionated but they also ask more questions (pr = 0.24, p < 0.02).”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“The variability among doctor-patient interactions in part reflects also these differences in the physicians' communicative routines for conducting a consultation.(26)”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“The patients' communicative behaviour is directly influenced by his/her personal and social attributes such as educational level, age, sex, anxiety, … .(25,26)”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Finally, although not immediately related to the patients' social class, we mention the large interindividual variation in the physicians' degree to which he provides information, issues directives, exhibits positive socio-emotional behaviour and engages in partnership-building.”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“More educated patients communicate more actively (they ask more questions, are more opinionated) and show more affective expressiveness, eliciting more information from their physician.”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,214
Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease
Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., & Ware, J. E. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010 · Cited by 2,043
Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters
Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., & Katz, N. R. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00002 · Cited by 1,069
Doctor Patient Communication: A Review
Begum, T. (2015) · Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons · doi:10.3329/jbcps.v32i2.26036 · Cited by 1,047
The Effect of Physician Behavior on the Collection of Data
Beckman, H., & Frankel, R. M. (1984) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-692 · Cited by 988
Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction.
KORSCH, B. M., Gozzi, E. K., & Francis, V. (1968) · PubMed · Cited by 925
GAPS IN DOCTOR-PATIENT COMMUNICATION
KORSCH, B. M., Gozzi, E. K., & Francis, V. (1968) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.42.5.855 · Cited by 753
Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics
Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (2010) · Cited by 541
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Smith, 1984, Sequential nonverbal behavior in the physician-patient interview, J. Family Practice, 81, 257
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Street, R. L., O'Malley, K. J., Cooper, L. A., & Haidet, P. (2008) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.821 · Cited by 684
Self-citationSocio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference?
Willems, S., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., Derese, A., & De Maeseneer, J. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.011 · Cited by 582
Patient Participation in Medical Consultations
Street, R. L., Gordon, H. S., Ward, M. M., Krupat, E., & Kravitz, R. L. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70 · Cited by 574
Self-citationStreet, R. L., Gordon, H. S., & Haidet, P. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.036 · Cited by 600
Self-citationLevetown, M., & and the Committee on Bioethics (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0565 · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Authors
- Street, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Street, Richard L.
- ORCID
- Street, Richard L.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1155-1163
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066437506
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- parent-physician communication, pediatric consultation, communication styles, communication adaptation, physician-patient interaction, information provision, partnership development, parental education, interpersonal influence
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Educational Status, Emotions, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Parents, Pediatrics, Personal Satisfaction, Physician-Patient Relations, Referral and Consultation, Social Adjustment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
