Production of methane in two non-ruminant herbivores.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kangaroos, a group of tubiform foregut fermenters, have high passage rate and low CH4 production.
“This premise is consistent with the high passage rate and low CH4 production by kangaroos, a group of tubiform foregut fermenters (Von Engelhardt et al., 1978).”
From Comparative Analysis of the Microbiota Between Sheep Rumen and Rabbit Cecum Provides New Insight Into Their Differential Methane Production (2018) · cites this paper as Von Engelhardt et al., 1978
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mi, L., Yang, B., Hu, X., Luo, Y., Liu, J., Yu, Z., & Wang, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00575 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- von Engelhardt, W., Wolter, S., Lawrenz, H., & Hemsley, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Venue
- Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-311
- ISSN
- 0300-9629 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081630458
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- methane production, tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii, Hyrax, Procavia capensis, cellulose digestion, hindgut fermentation, hydrogen production, dietary adaptation, low-protein diet, alfalfa hay, wheat chaff
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
