Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions
Abstract
This study explored whether males and females differ in facial muscle reactivity when exposed to facial expressions. The study also examined whether the sex of the stimulus faces differentially influences the response patterns to facial stimuli. Thus, the sex was manipulated in a 2 x 2 factorial design by exposing males and females to slides of angry and happy faces displayed by both sexes. Facial electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured from the corrugator and zygomatic muscle regions. The subjects were also required to rate the stimuli on different dimensions. The results showed that angry faces evoked increased corrugator activity whereas happy faces evoked increased zygomatic activity. As predicted, these effects were more pronounced for females, particularly for the response to happy faces. Interestingly, there were no facial EMG effects for gender of stimulus. It was further found that males and females perceived the stimuli similarly. The results are consistent with previous findings indicating that females are more facially reactive than are males.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavioral research has shown that imitative tendencies vary as a function of sex.
“even though behavioral research has shown that imitative tendencies vary as a function of sex (Butler, Ward, & Ramsey, 2015;Sonnby-Borgström, Jönsson, & Svensson, 2008;Dimberg & Lundquist, 1990).”
From Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation (2018) · cites this paper as Dimberg & Lundquist, 1990
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 342
- Authors
- Dimberg, U., & Lundquist, L.-O.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-159
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061038345
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- gender differences, facial expressions, corrugator supercilii, zygomaticus major, anger, happiness, facial electromyography, emotion perception
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Attention, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Individuality, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review