Cited by 342Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorEmotion and Mood Recognition

Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions

Dimberg, Ulf, Lundquist, Lars-Olov·1990·Biological Psychology

Abstract

This study explored whether males and females differ in facial muscle reactivity when exposed to facial expressions. The study also examined whether the sex of the stimulus faces differentially influences the response patterns to facial stimuli. Thus, the sex was manipulated in a 2 x 2 factorial design by exposing males and females to slides of angry and happy faces displayed by both sexes. Facial electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured from the corrugator and zygomatic muscle regions. The subjects were also required to rate the stimuli on different dimensions. The results showed that angry faces evoked increased corrugator activity whereas happy faces evoked increased zygomatic activity. As predicted, these effects were more pronounced for females, particularly for the response to happy faces. Interestingly, there were no facial EMG effects for gender of stimulus. It was further found that males and females perceived the stimuli similarly. The results are consistent with previous findings indicating that females are more facially reactive than are males.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90024-q

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 342

Authors
Dimberg, U., & Lundquist, L.-O.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
151-159
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061038345
Cited by
342
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
gender differences, facial expressions, corrugator supercilii, zygomaticus major, anger, happiness, facial electromyography, emotion perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Individuality, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review