The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Municipal solid waste combustion ash: State-of-the-knowledge
Abstract
Over the past several years there has been significant controversy concerning the proper management of the residues from combusting municipal solid waste (MSW) and their regulatory classification as hazardous or non-hazardous waste. This controversy and other factors (e.g., lack of federal guidance, heavy metal content, etc.) have resulted in inconsistent management requirements among several states and uncertainty about beneficial utilization of the residues. Heavy metal content and leaching of these metals (especially in the TCLP test) is most often cited as the reasons the material should be managed as a hazardous waste. If not managed properly, contamination of ground water by leaching of soluble salts from the ashes may also be a concern. The United States lags behind some countries in ash utilization. Although research and demonstration projects have indicated that the ashes can be beneficially utilized, less than 5% of the ashes are utilized in the United States. Other countries, including Denmark, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Japan are further advanced in ash utilization and in establishment of a systematic process for evaluating and selecting disposal and utilization options. This paper discusses ash characteristics, the state of ash management in the United States, federal initiatives, results of laboratory and field characterization of leachates from the ashes, barriers to ash utilization in the United States, and international perspectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Malkow, T. (2004) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-053x(03)00038-2 · Cited by 455
Leaching mechanisms of oxyanionic metalloid and metal species in alkaline solid wastes: A review
Cornelis, G., Johnson, C. A., Gerven, T. V., & Vandecasteele, C. (2008) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.02.001 · Cited by 391
Life cycle assessment of end-of-life treatments for plastic film waste
Hou, P., Xu, Y., Taiebat, M., Lastoskie, C., Miller, S. A., & Xu, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.278 · Cited by 150
Kirchofer, A., Becker, A., Brandt, A., & Wilcox, J. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4003982 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiles, C. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 325-344
- ISSN
- 0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040859566
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Municipal solid waste combustion ash: State-of-the-knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3894(95)00120-4
- The paper
- Wiles, C. C. (1996). Municipal solid waste combustion ash: State-of-the-knowledge. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(95)00120-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.