Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 973

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain

Open access
·1988·Pain

Abstract

While there is an abundance of pharmacological and biochemical evidence to suggest the existence of multiple opioid receptors, their precise localization within the brain is unclear. To help clarify this issue, the present study examined the distributions of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor subtypes in the rat forebrain and midbrain using in vitro autoradiography. Mu and delta receptors were labeled with the selective ligands 3H-DAGO (Tyr- D-Ala-Gly-MePhe-Gly-ol), and 3H-DPDPE (D-Pen2, D-Pen5-enkephalin), respectively, while the kappa receptors were labeled with 3H-(-)bremazocine in the presence of unlabeled DAGO and DPDPE. Based on previous findings in our laboratory, the labeling conditions were such that each ligand selectively occupied approximately 75% of each of the opioid sites. The results demonstrated that all 3 opioid receptor subtypes were differentially distributed in the rat brain. Mu binding was dense in anterior cingulate cortex, neocortex, amygdala, hippocampus, ventral dentate gyrus, presubiculum, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, thalamus, habenula, interpeduncular nucleus, pars compacta of the substantia nigra, superior and inferior colliculi, and raphe nuclei. In contrast, delta binding was restricted to only a few brain areas, including anterior cingulate cortex, neocortex, amygdala, olfactory tubercle, nucleus accumbens, and caudate putamen. Kappa binding, while not as widespread as observed with mu binding, was densely distributed in the amygdala, olfactory tubercle, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, medial preoptic area, hypothalamus, median eminence, periventricular thalamus, and interpeduncular nucleus. While all 3 opioid receptor subtypes could sometimes be localized within the same brain area, their precise distribution within the region often varied widely. For example, in the caudate putamen, mu binding had a patchy distribution, while delta and kappa sites were diffusely distributed, with delta sites being particularly dense ventrolaterally and kappa sites being concentrated ventromedially. These results support the existence of at least 3 distinct opioid receptors with possibly separate functional roles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90103-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 973

Metadata

Venue
Pain
Published
1988-05
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
267
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1523806406
Cited by
973
References
0
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90103-0
The paper
Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain. (1988). Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90103-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.