The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain
Open accessAbstract
While there is an abundance of pharmacological and biochemical evidence to suggest the existence of multiple opioid receptors, their precise localization within the brain is unclear. To help clarify this issue, the present study examined the distributions of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor subtypes in the rat forebrain and midbrain using in vitro autoradiography. Mu and delta receptors were labeled with the selective ligands 3H-DAGO (Tyr- D-Ala-Gly-MePhe-Gly-ol), and 3H-DPDPE (D-Pen2, D-Pen5-enkephalin), respectively, while the kappa receptors were labeled with 3H-(-)bremazocine in the presence of unlabeled DAGO and DPDPE. Based on previous findings in our laboratory, the labeling conditions were such that each ligand selectively occupied approximately 75% of each of the opioid sites. The results demonstrated that all 3 opioid receptor subtypes were differentially distributed in the rat brain. Mu binding was dense in anterior cingulate cortex, neocortex, amygdala, hippocampus, ventral dentate gyrus, presubiculum, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, thalamus, habenula, interpeduncular nucleus, pars compacta of the substantia nigra, superior and inferior colliculi, and raphe nuclei. In contrast, delta binding was restricted to only a few brain areas, including anterior cingulate cortex, neocortex, amygdala, olfactory tubercle, nucleus accumbens, and caudate putamen. Kappa binding, while not as widespread as observed with mu binding, was densely distributed in the amygdala, olfactory tubercle, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, medial preoptic area, hypothalamus, median eminence, periventricular thalamus, and interpeduncular nucleus. While all 3 opioid receptor subtypes could sometimes be localized within the same brain area, their precise distribution within the region often varied widely. For example, in the caudate putamen, mu binding had a patchy distribution, while delta and kappa sites were diffusely distributed, with delta sites being particularly dense ventrolaterally and kappa sites being concentrated ventromedially. These results support the existence of at least 3 distinct opioid receptors with possibly separate functional roles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reward Processing by the Opioid System in the Brain
Le Merrer, J., Becker, J. A. J., Befort, K., & Kieffer, B. L. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00005.2009 · Cited by 1,013
Kelley, A. E. (2004) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.11.015 · Cited by 942
Puelles, L., Kuwana, E., Puelles, E., Bulfone, A., Shimamura, K., Keleher, J., Smiga, S., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (2000) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20000828)424:3<409::aid-cne3>3.0.co;2-7 · Cited by 933
Mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: An in situ hybridization study
Mansour, A., Fox, C. A., Burke, S., Meng, F., Thompson, R. C., Akil, H., & Watson, S. J. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903500307 · Cited by 870
Greengard, P., Allen, P. B., & Nairn, A. C. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80798-9 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1523806406
- Cited by
- 973
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90103-0
- The paper
- Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain. (1988). Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90103-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.