The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immediate and long-term phantom breast syndrome after mastectomy: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-mastectomy breast pain
Abstract
Phantom breast syndrome (PBS) following mastectomy has already been reported by other authors. The temporal course, character and extent of these phenomena, however, have not yet been elucidated. In a prospective study, we investigated the incidence, clinical picture and the temporal course of PBS. One hundred and twenty women who, during a 1 year period, embarked consecutively on post-operative control or treatment at the department, were interviewed by a standard questionnaire 3 weeks after the operation. One year later 110 patients were interviewed again. The median age at the first interview was 54 years (Q1 = 45 years; Q3 = 62 years). The incidence of PBS was 25.8% at the first interview and 24.5% at the second. The incidence of phantom pain and non-painful phantom sensations was 13.3% and 15.0%, respectively, 3 weeks after mastectomy and 12.7% and 11.8%, respectively after 1 year. We found significant relationships between pre-operative pain and PBS, but no significant relation between age and the occurrence of PBS. Neither post-operative sequelae nor cancer treatment including radiotherapy seemed to affect the occurrence of PBS. Exteroceptive-like pain emerged as the most predominant type of pain from both interviews. At the time of the first interview, 35.0% of the patients experienced cicatrix pain which was clearly distinguishable from phantom pain; after 1 year, 22.7% of the patients had persistent cicatrix pain. The present incidence of PBS is close to the incidence reported by others. Persistent phantom pain may, however, be more common than usually expected. Also persistence of cicatrix pain seems to be more common than generally expected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coderre, T. J., Katz, J., Vaccarino, A. L., & Melzack, R. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90161-h · Cited by 1,966
Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix
Melzack, R. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90179-e · Cited by 808
Consequences of Inadequate Postoperative Pain Relief and Chronic Persistent Postoperative Pain
Joshi, G. P., & Ogunnaike, B. O. (2005) · Anesthesiology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.atc.2004.11.013 · Cited by 621
Nikolajsen, L., & Jensen, T. S. (2001) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/87.1.107 · Cited by 493
Neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery: proposed classification and research update
Jung, B. F., Ahrendt, G. M., Oaklander, A. L., & Dworkin, R. H. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00241-0 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Krøner, K., Krebs, B., Skov, J., & Jørgensen, H. S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-334
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026883436
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immediate and long-term phantom breast syndrome after mastectomy: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-mastectomy breast pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90092-4
- The paper
- Krøner, K., Krebs, B., Skov, J., & Jørgensen, H. S. (1989). Immediate and long-term phantom breast syndrome after mastectomy: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-mastectomy breast pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90092-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.