The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pain ‘memories’ in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations
Abstract
This paper reviews reports of phantom limb sensations which resemble somatosensory events experienced in the limb before amputation. It also presents descriptions of this phenomenon in 68 amputees who took part in a series of clinical studies. These somatosensory memories are predominantly replicas of distressing pre-amputation lesions and pains which were experienced at or near the time of amputation, and are described as having the same qualities of sensation as the pre-amputation pain. The patients who experience these pains emphasize that they are suffering real pain which they can describe in vivid detail, and insist that the experience is not merely a cognitive recollection of an earlier pain. Reports of somatosensory memories are less common when there has been a discontinuity, or a pain-free interval, between the experience of pain and amputation. Among the somatosensory memories reported are cutaneous lesions, deep tissue injuries, bone and joint pain and painful pre-amputation postures. The experience of somatosensory memories does not appear to be related to the duration of pre-amputation pain, time since amputation, age, gender, prosthetic use, level of amputation, number of limbs amputated, or whether the amputation followed an accident or illness. The results suggest that somatosensory inputs of sufficient intensity and duration can produce lasting changes in central neural structures which combine with cognitive-evaluative memories of the pre-amputation pain to give rise to the unified experience of a past pain referred to the phantom limb. Implications for pre- and post-operative pain control are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Phantom limbs, the self and the brain: The D.O. Hebb memorial lecture
Melzack, R. (1989) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/h0079793 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Cited by
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
Coderre, T. J., Katz, J., Vaccarino, A. L., & Melzack, R. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90161-h · Cited by 1,966
Self-citationSynaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0058 · Cited by 1,246
Acute Pain after Thoracic Surgery Predicts Long-Term Post-Thoracotomy Pain
Katz, J., Jackson, M., Kavanagh, B. P., & Sandler, A. N. (1996) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-199603000-00009 · Cited by 915
Self-citationTransition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors
Katz, J., & Seltzer, Z. (2009) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.09.20 · Cited by 782
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, J., & Melzack, R.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-336
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051143975
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain ‘memories’ in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90029-d
- The paper
- Katz, J., & Melzack, R. (1990). Pain ‘memories’ in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90029-d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.