Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of pre-incisional infiltration of tonsils with bupivacaine on the pain following tonsillectomy under general anesthesia

Jebeles, John A., Reilly, James S., Gutierrez, Juan F., Bradley, Edwin L., Kissin, Igor·1991·Pain

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that blockade of nociceptive input with bupivacaine during tonsillectomy can decrease pain beyond the immediate postoperative period. Fourteen patients between the ages of 6 and 18 years scheduled for tonsillectomy (with or without adenoidectomy) were randomly divided into two groups. The patients of both groups received 0.006 mg/kg atropine and anesthesia was induced by inhalation of halothone. Atracurium 0.5 mg/kg was used for myorelaxation. After oral intubation anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane plus nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen. In the bupivacaine group, 5 min before incision the tonsillar fossae were infiltrated with 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine (1 : 200,000). In the control group, the tonsillar fossae were infiltrated with normal saline with epinephrine (1 : 200,000). All patients received morphine 0.07 mg/kg (in the recovery room) and oral elixir with codeine 0.05 mg/kg plus acetaminophen 5 mg/kg every 4 h. Pain assessments were made using the visual analog (100 mm scale) self-rating method. Two types of pain were assessed: constant incisional pain and pain caused by drinking 100 ml of water. In the bupivacaine group, the constant pain score on the second day after surgery was 19 ± 6 compared to 74 ± 8 in the saline group (P < 0.0002). By the 4–5th day after surgery almost no constant pain occurred in the bupivacaine group, but the pain score remained at the 40–60 level in the saline group. The difference in pain intensity on swallowing between the bupivacaine and saline groups was present even on the 10th postoperative day (1 ± 1 vs. 14 ± 5, P < 0.05). The results indicate that pre-incisional infiltration of the tonsils with bupivacaine markedly decreased the intensity of pain following tonsillectomy well beyond the immediate postoperative period. An explanation for the long-lasting pain relief might be that neural blockade prevents nociceptive impulses from entering the central nervous system during and immediately after surgery and thus suppresses formation of the sustained hyperexcitable state that is responsible for the maintenance of postoperative pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90220-r

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jebeles, J. A., Reilly, J. S., Gutierrez, J. F., Bradley, E. L., & Kissin, I.
Venue
Pain
Published
1991-12
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
305-308
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055954044
Cited by
238
References
1
FWCI
13.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of pre-incisional infiltration of tonsils with bupivacaine on the pain following tonsillectomy under general anesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90220-r
The paper
Jebeles, J. A., Reilly, J. S., Gutierrez, J. F., Bradley, E. L., & Kissin, I. (1991). The effect of pre-incisional infiltration of tonsils with bupivacaine on the pain following tonsillectomy under general anesthesia. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90220-r

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.