The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Calcitonin in phantom limb pain: a double-blind study
Abstract
Salmon calcitonin (s-CT) has been shown to be a valuable analgesic in phantom limb pain (PLP) in several case reports. To evaluate these findings a double-blind crossover comparison of s-CT treatment versus placebo was initiated. Twenty-one out of 161 patients who had undergone major amputations and developed severe PLP 0-7 days after surgery were included in the study. For each patient a matched pair of infusions was prepared containing either 200 IU of s-CT or placebo. Group I (n = 11) was first given s-CT and group II (n = 10) placebo. When PLP reached a level of more than 3 on a numeric analogue scale (NAS) the first infusion was administered. The second infusion (crossover) or more infusions were given when the pain level again exceeded more than 3 on NAS. Using s-CT infusion, PLP was eased from a median of 7 to 4 on NAS in both groups (P less than 0.001), regardless of whether s-CT or placebo was given first. Placebo, however, did not change pain scores (median 7 on NAS, P greater than 0.1). In the s-CT group, but not in the placebo group, 4 individuals remained pain free without a second infusion. Any further treatment was performed with s-CT. One week after the first PLP treatment 19 patients (90%) had pain relief of more than 50%, 16 (76%) were completely pain free, and 15 (71%) never experienced PLP again. One year later 8 out of the 13 surviving patients (62%) still had more than 75% PLP relief. After 2 years PLP exceeded 3 on NAS in 5 individuals (42%), and the remaining 12 patients presented the same PLP as after 1 year. In conclusion, s-CT is a valuable treatment for PLP in the early postoperative period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nikolajsen, L., & Jensen, T. S. (2001) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/87.1.107 · Cited by 493
Postamputation pain: epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment
Cohen, S., & Hsu (2013) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s32299 · Cited by 372
Pharmacotherapy for the prevention of chronic pain after surgery in adults
Chaparro, L. E., Smith, S. A., Moore, R. A., Wiffen, P. J., & Gilron, I. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008307.pub2 · Cited by 315
Hormones and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism
Bringhurst, F. R., Demay, M. B., & Kronenberg, H. M. (2011) · Williams Textbook of Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-0324-5.00028-6 · Cited by 298
Pharmacologic interventions for treating phantom limb pain
Alviar, M. J. M., Hale, T., & Lim-Dungca, M. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006380.pub3 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaeger, H., & Maier, C.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-27
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984121716
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calcitonin in phantom limb pain: a double-blind study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90127-w
- The paper
- Jaeger, H., & Maier, C. (1992). Calcitonin in phantom limb pain: a double-blind study. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90127-w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.