Daily coping with pain from rheumatoid arthritis: patterns and correlates
Abstract
Seventy-five individuals with rheumatoid arthritis reported their pain coping, mood, and joint pain for 75 consecutive days. Pain coping strategies used most often were taking direct action to reduce the pain and using relaxation strategies; those used least often were expressing emotions about the pain and redefining the pain to make it more bearable. Several background characteristics, including gender, disability, neuroticism, and pain control perceptions predicted use of various coping strategies. Controlling for these characteristics, individuals who used relaxation more frequently as part of their daily coping repertoire had less daily pain during the course of the study, and those who reported more overall coping efforts were more likely to display declining levels of daily pain across time. Pain severity moderated the relations of seeking emotional support and use of distraction with daily mood. At low levels of pain, greater use of these strategies related to more positive mood but, at high levels of pain, related to less positive mood. Finally, individuals who reported a greater number of distinct forms of coping were more apt to enjoy improving daily mood over the course of the study. Findings are discussed in terms of the advantages of prospective daily research designs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In that study, those showing the highest level of coping effort exhibited a pattern of decreasing pain during the recording period.
“those showing the highest level of coping effort exhibiting a pattern of decreasing pain during the recording period.”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [3]
In a 75-day daily diary study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients complied quite well with completing each diary daily and mailing it in daily.
“patients with rheumatoid arthritis complied quite well with the requirement of completing each diary daily and mailing it in daily during a 75-day period.”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [3]
In that study, substantial variations in daily coping were evident.
“Substantial variations in daily coping were evident”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Affleck, G., Urrows, S., Tennen, H., & Higgins, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Affleck, Glenn
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-229
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028031767
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vanderbilt University
- University of Connecticut
- National Institutes of Health (5p60ar020621-19)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR 20621)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, pain coping, coping strategies, relaxation, emotional expression, pain intensity, mood, daily pain, emotional support, distraction, neuroticism, disability, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Patient Compliance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review