The effects of perceived versus enacted social support on the discriminative cue function of spouses for pain behaviors
Abstract
This study examined the effects of spouse social support on patient displays of pain behaviors. A standardized behavioral observation method was used to record pain behaviors in 110 chronic pain patients while the spouse was present and while the spouse was absent. Patients and their spouses also completed paper and pencil measures of spouse-provided social support as well as a demographic questionnaire. Results indicated that pain behaviors varied as a function of spouse presence and the type, or dimension, of support considered. Patients reporting higher levels of enacted support displayed a greater number of pain behaviors irrespective of spouse presence, consistent with the operant theory. When a measure of perceived support was used, the pain behaviors displayed differed, depending upon the level of support and spouse presence. Results are consistent with support-seeking and cognitive-behavioral models of the effects of social support on outcome. We discuss our findings within the context of a multidimensional model of support and pain and we caution against strict application of the operant model in treatment programs. Additional research is warranted to better understand the impact of support on the rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Paulsen and Altmaier found that patients with chronic lower back pain who reported that their spouses provided higher levels of social support displayed more pain behaviors while completing assigned tasks than did those reporting lower social support.
“they found that patients who reported that their spouses provided higher levels of social support displayed more pain behaviors while completing assigned tasks than did those patients reporting lower social support.”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [89]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Paulsen, J. S., & Altmaier, E. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulsen, Jane S.
- ORCID
- Paulsen, Jane S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-110
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978824394
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- social support, perceived support, chronic pain, pain behavior, spouses, support seeking, cognitive-behavioral model, pain rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Pain, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Spouses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review