The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heat pain thresholds: normative data and repeatability
Abstract
Measurement of thresholds for heat-induced pain was performed on 106 normal subjects, at thenar eminence and foot dorsum, using the reaction time-inclusive method of limits. Tests were repeated 2 weeks following the first test for most of the subjects. After determination that there were no outlying data points and that there was no systematic relationship between magnitude and variability of test scores, data from between 72 and 76 subjects were used to define normal upper and lower ranges by age, as well as repeatability coefficients. This was done through ANOVA-based procedures that extend standard repeatability assessment methods. Normative data tables are presented, with measures of repeatability for the various sites and modalities. For the conventional test range, reaching 55 degrees C, measurement of heat pain thresholds can define both hyper- and hypoalgesia. Application of repeatability coefficients allows for intra-individual inter-session comparison in longitudinal studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
Rolke, R., Baron, R., Maier, C., Tölle, T. R., Treede, D. R., Beyer, A., Binder, A., Birbaumer, N., Birklein, F., Bötefür, I. C., et al. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.041 · Cited by 2,609
Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials
Rolke, R., Magerl, W., Campbell, K. A., Schalber, C., Caspari, S., Birklein, F., & Treede, R. ‐. (2006) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.003 · Cited by 1,520
An association between migraine and cutaneous allodynia
Burstein, R., Yarnitsky, D., Goor-Aryeh, I., Ransil, B. J., & Bajwa, Z. H. (2000) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/1531-8249(200005)47:5<614::aid-ana9>3.0.co;2-n · Cited by 1,016
Self-citationBoulton, A. J. M., Malik, R. A., Arezzo, J. C., & Sosenko, J. M. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1458 · Cited by 913
Lautenbacher, S., Peters, J. H., Heesen, M., Scheel, J., & Kunz, M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.039 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- Yarnitsky, D., Sprecher, E., Zaslansky, R., & Hemli, J. A.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-332
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035918034
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heat pain thresholds: normative data and repeatability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00132-x
- The paper
- Yarnitsky, D., Sprecher, E., Zaslansky, R., & Hemli, J. A. (1995). Heat pain thresholds: normative data and repeatability. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00132-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
