The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reactive effects of diary self-assessment in chronic pain patients
Abstract
Several studies of experimental and acute clinical pain have indicated reactive effects of self-assessment on pain intensity and tolerance. A recent study of chronic pain patients (vonBaeyer 1994), however, failed to show these effects. The present investigation sought to determine whether reactive effects can be produced in chronic pain patients by an intensive self-assessment protocol. Using the methodology of ecological momentary assessment (EMA; Stone and Shiffman 1994), thirty-five chronic rheumatoid arthritis patients completed diaries of pain and mood seven times a day for 1 wk. Eighteen patients were included in the final sample because they responded to at least half of the number of hourly prompts for each of the 7 days. Using repeated measures analysis of the daily means, no significant effects of time were found for any measures. Reactive effects that result in an average change in pain levels over time, therefore, do not appear to be produced by intensive self-assessment in a naturalistic context. Results are discussed in terms of cognitive and behavioral theories of pain reactivity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These findings are in line with reports of no symptom reactivity in other patient populations, such as those with chronic pain (114) and mood disorders (81).”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [114]
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Arnett, F. C., Edworthy, S. M., Bloch, D. A., McShane, D. J., Fries, J. F., Cooper, N. S., Healey, L. A., Kaplan, S. R., Liang, M. H., Luthra, H. S., et al. (1988) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780310302 · Cited by 19,753
Revised Criteria for the Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Arnett, F. C. (1990) · Orthopaedic Nursing · doi:10.1097/00006416-199003000-00011 · Cited by 7,742
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,873
Ecological Momentary Assessment (Ema) in Behavioral Medicine
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/16.3.199 · Cited by 1,931
Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness
Fordyce, W. E. (1977) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(77)90029-x · Cited by 1,630
Williams, A. C. D. C. (1995) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(95)90016-0 · Cited by 1,472
The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis.
Suls, J. M., & Fletcher, B. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.249 · Cited by 1,224
Progress in Behavior Modification
Hersen, M., & Eisler, R. M. (1983) · Cited by 1,020
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bolton, 1991, Validierung elektronischer an konventionellen Schmerztagebu¨chern, Z. Rheumatol., 50, 55
- Brackertz, 1991, Realzeiterfaßte Schmerzzeitprofile unter der Behandlung mit Ibuprofen, Z. Rheumatol., 50, 39
- Bru¨ckle, 1991, Schmerzverlauf und -topographie bei generalisierten Tendomyopathien, Z. Rheumatol., 50, 19
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Heron, K. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2010) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910709x466063 · Cited by 1,438
Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science
Keefe, F. J., Rumble, M. E., Scipio, C. D., Giordano, L. A., & Perri, L. M. (2004) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.576 · Cited by 954
Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses
Scollon, C. N., Kim‐Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1023605205115 · Cited by 827
Stewart, W. F., Lipton, R. B., Kolodner, K. B., Sawyer, J., Lee, C., & Liberman, J. N. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00305-5 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruise, C. E., Broderick, J., Porter, L., Kaell, A., & Stone, A. A.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stone, Arthur A.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-258
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965958056
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- chronic pain, pain intensity, pain tolerance, rheumatoid arthritis, ecological momentary assessment, pain reactivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Pain, Self-Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
