Cited by 510Logic, programming, and type systemsAdvanced Algebra and Logicsemigroups and automata theory

A unification algorithm for typed λ-calculus

Open access
Huet, G.P.·1975·Theoretical Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3975(75)90011-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most knowledge representation languages avoid higher-order quantification owing to problems with decidability and theorem-proving efficiency.

    “Although McCarthy (1999) long advocated the use of higher-order logic for representing common sense reasoning, most knowledge representation languages avoid higher-order quantification owing to problems with decidability (Huet 1975) and theorem-proving efficiency.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huet, G. P.
Affiliations
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Corresponding author
Huet, G.P.
Venue
Theoretical Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-06
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
27-57
ISSN
0304-3975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034676877
Cited by
510
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Theoretical Computer Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
Keywords
unification algorithms, typed lambda calculus, most general unifier, search space reduction, algorithm correctness, directionality, convergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review