The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of programming with complex objects and collection types
Open accessAbstract
We present a new principle for the development of database query languages that the primitive operations should be organized around types. Viewing a relational database as consisting of sets of records, this principle dectates that we should investigate separately operations for records and sets. There are two immediate advantages of this approach, which is partly inspired by basic ideas from category theoryl. First, it provides a language for structures in which record and set types may be freely combined: nested relations or complex objects. Second, the fundamental operations for sets are closely related to those for other “collection types” such as bags or lists, and this suggests how database languages may be uniformly extended to these new types. the most general operation on sets, that of structural recursion, is one in which not all programs are well-defined. In looking for limited forms of this operation that always give rise to well-defined operations, we find a number of close connection with exiting database languages, notably those developed for complex objects. Moreover, even though the general paradigm of structural recursion is shown to be no more expressive than one of the existing languages for complex objects, it possesses certain properties of uniformity that make it a better candidate for an efficient, practical language. Thus rather than developing query languages by extending, for example, relational calculus, we advocate a very powerful paradigm in which a number of well-known languages are to be found as natural sublanguages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Categories for the Working Mathematician
Lane, S. M. (1971) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9839-7 · Cited by 8,817
A relational model of data for large shared data banks
Codd, E. F. (1970) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/362384.362685 · Cited by 5,547
A relational model of data for large shared data banks
Codd, E. F. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/357980.358007 · Cited by 4,796
The Lambda Calculus - Its Syntax and Semantics
(1984) · Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-14341-6 · Cited by 2,787
Notions of computation and monads
Moggi, E. (1991) · Information and Computation · doi:10.1016/0890-5401(91)90052-4 · Cited by 1,688
Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic.
Bell, J. L., Lambek, J., & Scott, P. (1989) · Journal of Symbolic Logic · doi:10.2307/2274784 · Cited by 1,083
Current trends in programming methodology
Yeh, R. T., & Chandy, K. M. (1977) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 545
Structure and complexity of relational queries
Chandra, A., & Harel, D. (1982) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(82)90012-5 · Cited by 534
The relational model with relation-valued attributes
Schek, H.-J., & Scholl, M. H. (1986) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/0306-4379(86)90003-7 · Cited by 474
Computable queries for relational data bases
chandra, A. K., & Harel, D. (1980) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(80)90032-x · Cited by 437
Cited by
Complexity and expressive power of logic programming
Dantsin, E., Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., & Voronkov, A. (2001) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/502807.502810 · Cited by 739
Buneman, P. (1997) · Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems · doi:10.1145/263661.263675 · Cited by 448
Self-citationLinks: Web Programming Without Tiers
Cooper, E., Lindley, S., Wadler, P., & Yallop, J. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74792-5_12 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Buneman, P., Naqvi, S., Tannen, V., & Wong, L.
- Venue
- Theoretical Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-48
- ISSN
- 0304-3975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130872776
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 18.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of programming with complex objects and collection types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3975(95)00024-q
- The paper
- Buneman, P., Naqvi, S., Tannen, V., & Wong, L. (1995). Principles of programming with complex objects and collection types. Theoretical Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(95)00024-q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.