Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Principles of programming with complex objects and collection types

Open access
Buneman, Peter, Naqvi, Shamim, Tannen, Val, Wong, Limsson·1995·Theoretical Computer Science

Abstract

We present a new principle for the development of database query languages that the primitive operations should be organized around types. Viewing a relational database as consisting of sets of records, this principle dectates that we should investigate separately operations for records and sets. There are two immediate advantages of this approach, which is partly inspired by basic ideas from category theoryl. First, it provides a language for structures in which record and set types may be freely combined: nested relations or complex objects. Second, the fundamental operations for sets are closely related to those for other “collection types” such as bags or lists, and this suggests how database languages may be uniformly extended to these new types. the most general operation on sets, that of structural recursion, is one in which not all programs are well-defined. In looking for limited forms of this operation that always give rise to well-defined operations, we find a number of close connection with exiting database languages, notably those developed for complex objects. Moreover, even though the general paradigm of structural recursion is shown to be no more expressive than one of the existing languages for complex objects, it possesses certain properties of uniformity that make it a better candidate for an efficient, practical language. Thus rather than developing query languages by extending, for example, relational calculus, we advocate a very powerful paradigm in which a number of well-known languages are to be found as natural sublanguages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3975(95)00024-q

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Buneman, P., Naqvi, S., Tannen, V., & Wong, L.
Venue
Theoretical Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-09
Volume
149
Issue
1
Pages
3-48
ISSN
0304-3975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130872776
Cited by
256
References
18
FWCI
18.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of programming with complex objects and collection types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3975(95)00024-q
The paper
Buneman, P., Naqvi, S., Tannen, V., & Wong, L. (1995). Principles of programming with complex objects and collection types. Theoretical Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(95)00024-q

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.