The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A monthly effect in stock returns
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The mean return for stocks is positive only for days immediately before and during the first half of calendar months, and indistinguishable from zero for days during the last half of the month. This ‘monthly effect’ is independent of other known calendar anomalies such as the January effect documented by others and appears to be caused by a shift in the mean of the distribution of returns from days in the first half of the month relative to days in the last half.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stock returns and the weekend effect
French, K. R. (1980) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(80)90021-5 · Cited by 1,998
Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality
Keim, D. B. (1983) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(83)90025-9 · Cited by 1,801
Capital market seasonality: The case of stock returns
Rozeff, M. S., & Kinney, W. R. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90028-3 · Cited by 1,226
Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns
Gibbons, M. R., & Hess, P. (1981) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/296147 · Cited by 1,170
The anomalous stock market behavior of small firms in January
Reinganum, M. R. (1983) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(83)90029-6 · Cited by 848
Gultekin, M. N., & Gultekin, N. B. (1983) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(83)90044-2 · Cited by 571
New Findings Regarding Day‐of‐the‐Week Returns over Trading and Non‐Trading Periods: A Note
ROGALSKI, R. J. (1984) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb04927.x · Cited by 481
Roll, R. (1983) · The Journal of Portfolio Management · doi:10.3905/jpm.1983.18 · Cited by 429
Day-of-the-week and intraday effects in stock returns
Smirlock, M., & Starks, L. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90011-5 · Cited by 341
New evidence on the nature of size-related anomalies in stock prices
Brown, P., Kleidon, A. W., & Marsh, T. A. (1983) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(83)90026-0 · Cited by 337
Cited by
FAMA, E. F. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x · Cited by 5,350
Nonlinear Dynamics and Stock Returns
Scheinkman, J. A., & LeBaron, B. (1989) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/296465 · Cited by 772
How Much Do Investors Care About Macroeconomic Risk? Evidence from Scheduled Economic Announcements
Savor, P., & Wilson, M. (2013) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s002210901300015x · Cited by 409
Leaning for the Tape: Evidence of Gaming Behavior in Equity Mutual Funds
Carhart, M. M., Kaniel, R., Musto, D. K., & Reed, A. V. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00438 · Cited by 361
Automated trading with performance weighted random forests and seasonality
Booth, A., Gerding, E., & McGroarty, F. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.009 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Ariel, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Financial Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-174
- ISSN
- 0304-405X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965256629
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 32.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A monthly effect in stock returns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-405x(87)90066-3
- The paper
- Ariel, R. A. (1987). A monthly effect in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(87)90066-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.