The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Goodness-of-fit in optimizing models
Open accessAbstract
Conventional econometric tests of optimizing models typically involve embedding the optimizing model in a parametric specification and then examining the parametric restrictions imposed by the optimization hypothesis. The optimization hypothesis is rejected if the estimated parameters are significantly different, in the statistical sense, from the values implied by optimization. I argue that a more fruitful approach to testing optimizing behavior is to measure the departure from optimization using the estimated objective function, and see whether this departure is significant in an economic sense. I discuss procedures for doing this that can be used in several sorts of optimizing models, and give a detailed illustration in the case of aggregate demand estimation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seiford, L. M., & Thrall, R. M. (1990) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-u · Cited by 1,921
A Test of the Unitary and Collective Models of Household Labour Supply
Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (1997) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00001.x · Cited by 324
Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment
Ahn, D., Choi, S., Gale, D., & Kariv, S. (2014) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe243 · Cited by 303
Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey
Grosskopf, S. (1996) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/bf00157039 · Cited by 289
Choi, S., Kariv, S., Müller, W., & Silverman, D. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.6.1518 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Varian, H. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Econometrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 125-140
- ISSN
- 0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1546360391
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goodness-of-fit in optimizing models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90051-t
- The paper
- Varian, H. R. (1990). Goodness-of-fit in optimizing models. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90051-t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.